Question

In: Operations Management

Please read the case below and answer the following question:    In court, Vinson’s allegations were countered...

Please read the case below and answer the following question:    In court, Vinson’s allegations were countered by Taylor’s version of the facts. Will there always be a “your word against mine” problem in sexual harassment cases? What could Vinson have done to strengthen her case?

Consenting to Sexual Harassment

THE CASE OF VINSON V. TAYLOR, HEARd BEFOREthe federal district court for the District of Columbia, Mechelle Vinson alleged that Sidney Taylor, her supervisor at Capital City Federal Savings and Loan, had sexually harassed her.73But the facts of the case were contested.In court Vinson testified that about a year after she began working at the bank, Taylor asked her to have sexual relations with him. She claimed that Taylor said she “owed” him because he had obtained the job for her. Although she turned down Taylor at first, she eventually became involved with him. She and Taylor engaged in sexual relations, she said, both during and after business hours, in the remaining three years she worked at the bank. The encounters included intercourse in a bank vault and in a storage area. Taylor was Vinson’s supervisor, the court reasoned that notice to him was not notice to the bank.Vinson appealed the case, and the Court of Appeals held that the district court had erred in three ways. First, the district court had overlooked the fact that there are two possible kinds of sexual harassment. Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Spottswood Robinson distinguished cases in which the victim’s continued employment or promotion is conditioned on giving in to sexual demands and those cases in which the victim must tolerate a “substantially discriminatory work environment.” The lower court had failed to consider whether Vinson’s case involved harassment of the second kind.Second, the higher court also overruled the district court’s finding that because Vinson voluntarily engaged in a sexual relationship with Taylor, she was not a victim of sexual in the bank basement. Vinson also testified that Taylor often actually “assaulted or raped” her. She contended that she was forced to submit to Taylor or jeopardize her employment.Taylor, for his part, denied the allegations. He testified that he had never had sex with Vinson. On the contrary, he alleged that Vinson had made advances toward him and that he had declined them. He contended that Vinson had brought the charges against him to “get even” because of a work-related dispute.In its ruling on the case, the court held that if Vinson and Taylor had engaged in a sexual relationship, that relationship was voluntary on the part of Vinson and was not employment related. The court also held that Capital City Federal Savings and Loan did not have “notice” of the alleged harassment and was therefore not liable. Assuming the truth of Vinson’s version of the case, do you think her employer, Capital City Federal Savings and Loan, should be held liable for sexual harassment it was not aware of? Should the employer have been aware of it? Does the fact that Taylor was a supervi-sor make a difference? In general, when should an employer be liable for harassment?4.What steps do you think Vinson should have taken when Taylor first pressed her for sex? Should she be blamed for having given in to him? Assuming that there was sexual harassment despite her acquies-cence, does her going along with Taylor make her partly responsible or mitigate Taylor’s wrongdoing?5.In court, Vinson’s allegations were countered by Taylor’s version of the facts. Will there always be a “your word against mine” problem in sexual harassment cases? What could Vinson have done to strengthen her case?harassment. Voluntariness on Vinson’s part had “no bearing,” the judge wrote, on “whether Taylor made Vinson’s toleration of sexual harassment a condition of her employment.” Third, the Court of Appeals held that any discriminatory activity by a supervisor is attributable to the employer, regardless of whether the employer had specific notice.In his dissent to the decision by the Court of Appeals, Judge Robert Bork rejected the majority’s claim that “vol-untariness” did not automatically rule out harassment. He argued that this position would have the result of depriving the accused person of any defense, because he could no longer establish that the supposed victim was really “a willing participant.” Judge Bork contended further that an employer should not be held vicariously liable for a super-visor’s acts that it didn’t know about.Eventually the case arrived at the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld the majority verdict of the Court of Appeals, stating that:[T]he fact that sex-related conduct was “voluntary,” in the sense that the complainant was not forced to participate against her will, is not a defense to a sexual harassment suit brought under Title VII. The gravamen of any sexual harassment claim is that the alleged sexual advances were “unwelcome.”. . . The correct inquiry is whether respondent by her con-duct indicated that the alleged sexual advances were unwelcome, not whether her actual participation in sexual intercourse was voluntary.The Court, however, rejected the Court of Appeals’s posi-tion that employers are strictly liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of the particular circumstances.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Capital City Federal Savings and Loan is not completely liable for the sexual harassment charges which Vinson has claimed Taylor has done to her. Firstly, she had never escalated the matter and informed her second- in -command regarding the harassment. Secondly, she had no evidence to prove her case. However, the employer ought to have been aware of this as they had relations during working hours as well.

Taylor, being a supervisor does make a difference. The reason being, a supervisor has the power to impact the sub-ordinate such as Vinson's performance rating . The employer must be liable for sexual harassment, if it has occurred within or outside the company and between their employees.

Vinson must have informed the HR professional regarding Taylor inappropriate behavior at it's first occurrence. Yes, she is to be blamed for her fate as she has shown no resistance and will to fight Taylor's indecent request. In fact, she has agreed to his requests. She has been partly wrong as well.

Taylor has completely refused having any relations with Vinson. And Vinson does not have any evidence nor any documentation to prove her point. There will always be the problem of “your word against mine” as there is no proof of either statements, the argument will be based on words only.


Related Solutions

Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: In 2007, JetBlue was a...
Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: In 2007, JetBlue was a booming young airline with a strong reputation for outstanding service. In fact, the low-fare airline referred to itself as a customer service company that just happened to fly planes. But on Valentine’s Day 2007, JetBlue was hit by the perfect storm—literally—of events that led to an operational meltdown. One of the most severe storms of the decade covered JetBlue’s main hub at New York’s...
Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: COMPANY Case: Porsche: Guarding the...
Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: COMPANY Case: Porsche: Guarding the Old While Bringing in the New Porsche (pronounced Porsh-uh) is a unique company. It has always been a niche brand that makes cars for a small and distinctive segment of automobile buyers. In 2009, Porsche sold only 27,717 cars in the five models it sells in the United States. Honda sold about 10 times that many Accords alone. But Porsche owners are as rare...
Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: Red Bull- Waking a New...
Please read the case provided below and answer the following question: Red Bull- Waking a New Market Little did Austrian business man Dietrich Mateschitz suspect when he visited Bangkok, Thailand in the early 1980’s his trip would launch not only a new product but also a new product category. Mateschitz international marketing director for Blendax a German tooth paste producer encountered Krating Daeng, “tonic syrup” that Red Bull Beverage Company had been marketing in Thailand for years. Mateschitz discovered that...
Please see the Supplier Selection Case Study.pdf (below). Read that case study and answer the following...
Please see the Supplier Selection Case Study.pdf (below). Read that case study and answer the following questions. You DO NOT have to answer the question in the case study. a. What are three key challenges in using data for decision making? b. Using the guidelines presented by Ingrid, identify the top 40% of suppliers (i.e. the top 2 suppliers since there are 5). c. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the top suppliers? d. Currently, Ingrid is focusing on...
Please read the case and answer the following question: 1. Why are big companies such as...
Please read the case and answer the following question: 1. Why are big companies such as Siemens, GE, Nestle, and P&G targeting the "bottom of the pyramid"? Please review the concept of price escalation to answer the following question: 2. In international marketing, price escalation can make a company’s product less competitive. In particular, exporters need to find ways to cope with price escalation. Suppose the U.S. motorbike manufacturer Harley-Davidson plans to export its products to the European market. Please...
The following are case questions, please read the facts and answer: Question:(1) is there a contract...
The following are case questions, please read the facts and answer: Question:(1) is there a contract under the CISG? (2) And why?
Please read the case and answer the question at the end of the case. Title: Last-chance...
Please read the case and answer the question at the end of the case. Title: Last-chance saloon GM prepares to close five factories, attracting Donald Trump’s ire Mary Barra is responding to customers’ soaring appetite for SUVs and pickups By: Print edition | Business, The Economist.Nov 29th 2018 | NEW YORK THE CAR industry’s changing fortunes have left a deep mark on Detroit’s urban landscape. Once-bustling factories such as the Fisher body plant, Ford’s Highland Park and the Packard plant...
Read the case below and answer the following question. Learning to lead Develop and describe measures...
Read the case below and answer the following question. Learning to lead Develop and describe measures a business could use to assess each of the traits, characteristics, and skills listed below in managers, so the company could select those managers with the strongest potential for leadership. In other words, describe how you would go about selecting managers for special leadership training and development. Most large businesses devote considerable resources to identifying those managers with the most leadership potential, and then...
Read the following case and answer the question below. McDonald’s When a customer drives up to...
Read the following case and answer the question below. McDonald’s When a customer drives up to the speaker box at some McDonald’s drive-throughs, their order is placed with an employee located in a distant call center. The order, along with a photograph taken to the match the customer with the order, is then instantly displayed on a video screen in the food preparation area of the restaurant where the order is placed. Brainerd, Michigan – Ellie Feld pulled into the...
Please read the case below and answer in the following format: 1) Relevant Law 2) Conclusion...
Please read the case below and answer in the following format: 1) Relevant Law 2) Conclusion - the outcome, and why. The book for this course is Business Law with UCC application - 14th edition The case is the following one: Lamas Company, Inc., was incorporated in Georgia. Baldwin negotiated with Lamas, sole owner of Lamas Company, Inc., to finish some electrical work on a construction site. When Baldwin was dissatisfied with the work, he decided to sue. Unfortunately, the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT