Question

Brown purchased a pair of woolen underpants from Underwear Galore in Adelaide. As a result of wearing the underpants without first washing them, he contracted dermatitis as the underpants contained bisulphite of soda, which it was found had been left in the underpants during the manufacturing process. The underpants had been packaged in a clear cellophane wrap, but the bisulphite of soda couldn’t be seen on a reasonable inspection by either the retailer or the buyer.

Has Brown any remedy or remedies available to him against the retailer, Underwear Galore, under the Australian Consumer Law? Explain what Brown has to establish in order to succeed in an action and whether, in your opinion, he would be successful. (10 marks, maximum 500 words)

Answer 1

Answer:

The following are Facts of the given case:

A pair of woolen underpants , Mr. Brown bought. He finds resulting to wearing it that he had a dermatitis condition. He saw that during the preparing peocess the samples contain bisulphite pop. The seller or customer didn't see this at the time of the exchange, considering the way that the trousers were made sure about with a layer of cellophane.

In the given case, I acknowledge that Mr Brown may cure how he is experiencing an ilness because of the imprudence of producers in consistence with the Australian Consumer Law provisions. He can say that the product has been paid or substituted. The legal standards recommend that, in particular, by sending an complaint letter to the client, he will have the choice to seek damages from the client really in case he comes up short.

The Aim of Australian consumer law is to advance sensible exchange legislation each country and district in order to improve the benefit of Australians. Uniform consumer protection legislation is made sure about by Article 2 of the Competition and Consumer Law 2010, as indicated by Australian consumption laws.

As expressed, Mr Brown may be found equipped for remedies under the Australian Consumer law against the retailer Galore. The explanation being, in compliance with Australian order, for losses that the customer has upheld as a result of a sensible or reasonable item issue, every customer may guarantee compensation.

As I might want to think, yes Mr. Brown would be effective and successful.