In: Finance
Based on the liquidity ratios, how would you describe Burlington Company's short-term cash situation?
What has happened to the Burlington Company efficiency ratios between 2009 and 2010? What does that tell you about the company's inventory levels? About the company's efficient use of assets?
Have the company's profitability ratios improved? What may have caused this?
Income Statement | Balance Sheets | |||||||||||||||
for Years Ending December 31 | Common Size | as of December 31 | Liquidity Ratios | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Fin Stmts | Common Size | Current Ratio | 4% | 3% | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | Fin Stmts | Quick Ratio | 2% | 2% | |||||||
Sales | $ 900,000 | $ 800,000 | 100% | 100% | Assets | 2010 | 2009 | Working Capital | $ 122,000 | $ 102,000 | ||||||
Cost of Sales | 610,000 | 480,000 | 68% | 60% | Cash | $ 40,000 | $ 39,000 | 8% | 9% | Avg. Collection Period | 28% | 20% | $ 2,466.00 | $ 2,192.00 | ||
Gross Margin | 290,000 | 320,000 | 32% | 40% | Accounts Receivable | 54,000 | 59,000 | 11% | 13% | |||||||
Selling & Admin expenses | 248,000 | 280,000 | 28% | 35% | Inventory | 70,000 | 43,000 | 14% | 10% | Asset Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
Income before taxes | 42,000 | 40,000 | 5% | 5% | Prepaid Expenses | 4,000 | 4,000 | 1% | 1% | Inventory Turnover | 9% | 11% | ||||
Income tax expense | 17,000 | 18,000 | 2% | 2% | Fixed Assets (net) | 340,000 | 310,000 | 67% | 68% | |||||||
Net Income | $ 25,000 | $ 22,000 | 3% | 3% | Total Assets | $ 508,000 | $ 455,000 | 100% | 100% | |||||||
Solvency Ratio | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities & Equities | Debt to Equity | 0.40% | 0.50% | |||||||||||||
Accounts Payable | $ 40,000 | $ 38,000 | 27% | 27% | ||||||||||||
12.50% | Salaries Payable | 2,000 | 3,000 | 1% | 2% | Profitability | ||||||||||
Taxes Payable | 4,000 | 2,000 | 3% | 1% | Return on Investment | 14% | 14% | |||||||||
Long Term Debt | 100,000 | 100,000 | 69% | 70% | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 146,000 | 143,000 | 29% | 31% | ||||||||||||
Contributed Capital | 200,000 | 175,000 | 39% | 39% | Use the following amounts to calculate the | |||||||||||
Retained Earnings | 162,000 | 137,000 | 32% | 30% | 2009 asset efficiency ratios: | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities & Equities | $ 508,000 | $ 455,000 | 100% | 100% | 2008 inventory | $ 40,000 | ||||||||||
Use the following amounts to calculate the | ||||||||||||||||
rate of return for investment: | ||||||||||||||||
2008 Contributed Capital | $200,000 |
(a). For short term cash we look at the quick ratio as it exculdes the inventory from current assets and is better to look at for short term cash: we get a quick ratio = 2.04 which is quite high and current ratio = 3.65 for 2010. So these are quie healthy ratios and morover the quick ratio is quite healthy and we can say for Burlington the short term cash condition is very good and firm is quite liquid as well.
(b). Efficiency ratios: We assume given sales as net sales. No any change is observed for Asset efficiency ratio which shows management is as effective as 2009 in 2010. Sales have gone up and accordingly assets have grown. Also Avg collection period is quite healthy.
Ratios | 2010 | 2009 |
Avg Collection period | 22.91 days | Data for 2008 needed |
Asset efficiency ratio | 1.77 | 1.76 |
inventory turnover | 10.796 | Data for 2008 needed |
Company has been utilizing its Assets well enough. 1.77 is a good Asset turnover ratio. But company has not improved that ratio much relative to previous year. Also the inventory levels in terms of absolute numbers have gone up despite of increasing COGS. Inventory turnover ratio is low, it should be high for clearance of inventory to be high. So I would say level of inventory has gone up.
(c). For profitability lets consider following 2 ratios.
Ratio | 2010 | 2009 |
Return on Equity | 6.9% | 7.05% |
net profit margin | 2.77% | 2.75% |
Profitability ratios are not good for the firm. ROE needs to be increased by about 2-3% from current levels and net profit margin is also not good. Moreover ROE has gone down over 2 years and NPM has improved negligibly. Although the net income has increased but at the same time total equity has increased too, as capital has been raised, and at the same time firm has retained a lot, thus ROE has decreased.
Also the admin expenses have been reduced along with increase in net sales but net income has not increased much. Hence the effects have been nullified by the taxes as well keeping the net profit margin the same.