Question

In: Economics

Watch the TED Talk 2010 series by Sheryl Sandberg "why we have too few women leaders"....

Watch the TED Talk 2010 series by Sheryl Sandberg "why we have too few women leaders".

Evaluate the speech and explain in detail the weaknesses and strengths of this speech.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer)

  • Following are the strengths of the speech
  1. Use of short experiences-Be it equity investment pitch or a meeting with senior government official where she asked 2 of their female collegues to sit at the table or the experience where men kept their hands raised while women didn't,these examples connected with audience at a personal level and made her speech interesting.
  2. Data presented be it number of c-executives,heads of states or dropouts gave a different perspective for audience ,at the same time it made her speech well researched.
  3. Solution oriented speech-Speech looked at 3 to do points which is an important initiative as it just does not point the problem but look at solution too.
  4. An important topic was covered in an interesting way without making speech dull, as these speeches generally tend to be boring which can kill the importance of the topic.
  • Weaknesses of the speech
  1. Cherry picking data-Data was cherry picked to support argument but such speeches should also look at increase in women's participation through numbers,how increase is showing progress,but that data is not presented which doesn't give full picture.
  2. Assumptions can be dangerous-To assume and support your view points ,to take assumptions can make it very subjective and biased,even the experiences are subjective such as why name Howard was liked over Heidi,why everything has to be strongly assumed and it makes speech biased
  3. Never looked at other side of the fence-Speech was focused on how women don't ask for promotions or think too much in advance but it never looked at a lot of companies' paternity leave rules where fathers are not expected to take break,speech never talks about problems which comes with expectations or how at times it is about risk taking approach ,it talks about rights but less of responsibilities.

In nutshell,speech was good and effective but at same time it did suffer from subjective bias which could have been eliminated.

Answer is complete.Thank you!


Related Solutions

Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Operating Officer of Facebook says women have to take charge of their careers...
Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Operating Officer of Facebook says women have to take charge of their careers and stop making bad decisions. She believes they do too much "leaning back" - such as taking a back or corner seat at a meeting table, and do too much "leaning out" - such as not accepting new responsibilities because motherhood is planned sometime in the future. Instead, Sandberg advises women to "lean in" and "don't leave before you leave". Is Sandberg being too...
Watch the TED Talk below from the author of the The Bottom Billion: "Why the Poorest...
Watch the TED Talk below from the author of the The Bottom Billion: "Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It"?
Watch the following Ted Talk by Dan Pink and collaborate on the questions provided. I have...
Watch the following Ted Talk by Dan Pink and collaborate on the questions provided. I have also included an animation of the same talk available on YouTube. Both are interesting. 1.https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_the_puzzle_of_motivation (ted talk) 2.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc (RSA animate) "Career analyst Dan Pink examines the puzzle of motivation, starting with a fact that social scientists know but most managers don't: Traditional rewards aren't always as effective as we think." Questions to consider: How does purpose drive motivation and inspire creativity? How does this...
why working from home is good for business/ The way we work a TED series summarize...
why working from home is good for business/ The way we work a TED series summarize and write what did you learn
Why have there been historically so few women and minority-owned businesses? There are fewer funds available...
Why have there been historically so few women and minority-owned businesses? There are fewer funds available to them and there has been a lack of women and minority mentors to guide new entrepreneurs in these categories. Women and minorities traditionally were less likely to consider all of the risks in entrepreneurship. The industries in which women and minorities started new companies have had downward trends, limiting the probability of their businesses succeeding. Women and minorities have historically preferred traditional careers.
Why is public order necessary? Do we have enough public order or too little? How can...
Why is public order necessary? Do we have enough public order or too little? How can we tell? What might a large, complex society like ours be like without laws and without a system of criminal justice? Would you want to live in such a society? Why or why not?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT