Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Disease X has a low prevalence in population A, and high prevalence in population B. Which...

  1. Disease X has a low prevalence in population A, and high prevalence in population B. Which of the following is true? (2 points)
    1. The positive predictive value of a screening test will be higher in population B compared to population A.
    2. The positive predictive value of a screening test will be higher in population A compared to population B.
    3. The predictive value of a test is not related to the prevalence of disease in a population.
    4. None of the above.

  1. If a test has a sensitivity of 100%, it means: (2 points)
    1. That the test identifies everyone with the disease and never flags healthy people as having the disease.
    2. That the test identifies everyone with the disease, but it may mistakenly flag some healthy people as having the disease.
    3. It should not be used as a screening test because it may have some false positives.
    4. All of the above.
  1. At a population level, which of the following aspects of a screening test cannot lead to improved health outcomes? (2 points)
    1. The high proportion of the population with the condition that the test seeks to detect.
    2. The high sensitivity of the test in identifying the condition.
    3. A low frequency of false positive tests or a low frequency of adverse health outcomes from false positive results.
    4. The efficacy of treatment for persons who are screened as positive is not significant.

  1. Which of the following statements describes the Kappa statistic? (2 points)
    1. A Kappa value of <0.40 represents excellent agreement.
    2. The Kappa statistic is a measure of agreement.
    3. The Kappa statistic is a measure of reliability.
    4. All of the above.
    5. Only B and C.

  1. Positive predictive value is more influenced by the sensitivity than the specificity of the screening test. (1 point)
    1. True
    2. False
  2. A “gold standard” is used to determine whether a screening test is
    1. cost-effective
    2. reliable
    3. valid
    4. none of the above

Please answer the 6 questions. Thank you.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Q2: (a) The prevalence of a disease in a population is 0.02. Explain the meaning of...
Q2: (a) The prevalence of a disease in a population is 0.02. Explain the meaning of this in your own words. (1pt) (b) The incidence rate of a disease in a population is 5 per 10,000 person years. Explain the meaning of this in your own words. (1pt)
Disease Prevalence 50% Prevalence Disease 10%
Disease Prevalence 50%Prevalence Disease 10%Prevalence Disease 1%YesNoYesNoYesNoTest YESTP   800 AFP 100 BTP   160 AFP 180 BTP 16   AFP    198 BTest NOFN 200 CTN 900 DFN     40 CTN 1,620 D   FN    4   CTN 1,782 DTotals1,0001,0002001,800201,980Specificity=    TN    =                       TN+FPX 100- ________%Specificity=Specificity=
The prevalence of a disease D in the population is 10%. A new test is introduced...
The prevalence of a disease D in the population is 10%. A new test is introduced by a laboratory with the following characteristics. The laboratory notes that if someone has the disease, his or her test will be positive 90% of the time (P(pos|D) = 0.90). However, a completely healthy individual will test positive with probability 0.06 (P (pos|Dc) = .06).    (a) If we randomly select 5 people from this population, what is the probability that all of them...
1a) A survey was conducted to estimate the prevalence of a disease among a student population....
1a) A survey was conducted to estimate the prevalence of a disease among a student population. What type of epidemiological study is this? Case-control Cluster randomized trial Longitudinal Cross-sectional Cohort 1b) Would this type of study be affected by selection bias? How? 1c) Would such bias affect prevalence estimate? How?
A particular heart disease is said to have a prevalence of 1/1000 in a specific population....
A particular heart disease is said to have a prevalence of 1/1000 in a specific population. In a sample of 50 people chosen randomly, what is the probability that at least two people have this disease?
A screening test is applied to a population of 1,000 in which the prevalence of the...
A screening test is applied to a population of 1,000 in which the prevalence of the disease in question is 10%. The sensitivity of this test is 96% and the specificity is 92%. The cost of screening the 1000 people is $50 (fifty dollars) per person. A newer screening test has the same sensitivity, a specificity of 96%, but costs $0.50 (fifty cents) more per test than the older screening test. For each person with a positive result from either...
Suppose there are high- and low-ability workers. The percentage of the population that is high-ability is...
Suppose there are high- and low-ability workers. The percentage of the population that is high-ability is ? and the percentage that is low-ability is 1 − ?. If the employer can distinguish the two types, it pays equal to the output of the two types: ?h and ??, respectively. If the employer cannot distinguish the two types it pays ?̅, which is equal to the expected (i.e., average) output of all workers it employs. a. Suppose education is a continuous...
In comparing two different populations, the prevalence of disease X is much higher in Newtown than...
In comparing two different populations, the prevalence of disease X is much higher in Newtown than in Oldtown, but the incidence is much lower in Newtown than in Oldtown 1) Which population has a higher risk of getting disease X? 2) Describe two different possible scenarios of how Newtown could have a higher prevalence but lower incidence than Oldtown.
If the prevalence of a disease has been more or less constant for the past ten...
If the prevalence of a disease has been more or less constant for the past ten years, what would be the effect of a treatment that prolongs the life of people suffering from the disease? (increase, decrease, stays the same, fluctuates) Thoroughly explain your response. If the prevalence of a disease has been more or less constant for the past ten years, what would be the effect if a large number of healthy people immigrated into the population? (increase, decrease,...
In Community X (population 20,000), an epidemiologist conducted a prevalence survey in January of 2012 and...
In Community X (population 20,000), an epidemiologist conducted a prevalence survey in January of 2012 and reported an HIV prevalence of 2.2%. Over the next 12 months, the department of health reported an additional 50 new HIV cases between February 2012 and January 2013. The total population stayed constant at 20,000. Part 1 How many people had HIV in January 2012? Present or describe the formula you used to arrive at your answer. Calculate the incidence rate assuming no HIV-related...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT