Question

In: Economics

Suppose that the Malaysian government is considering whether to impose an import tariff or quota to...

Suppose that the Malaysian government is considering whether to impose an import tariff or quota to protect domestic automobile industry. As an advisor, what are your advice to the government? Please analyse the similarities and differences between import tariff and import quota when there is a reduction in supply for the product. Use appropriate diagram/s to demonstrate your answers.

Solutions

Expert Solution

My advice to the government is to impose import quota. An import quota sets a maximum amount of automobiles which can be imported by the Malaysian government. This means no matter what the demand in the market for imported vehicle is, the supply for the same is fixed by the government (i.e. quota).

On the other hand, what does an import tariff do? When an import tariff is imposed, the prices of these imported automobiles increase thereby not attracting the domestic consumers to buy these vehicles. This conceded well with the law of demand: as price increases the demand decreases. But we must understand here, that the demand decreases but doesn't reach the null value. With the wealthiest 20% contributing close to 58% of Malaysia's wealth, these Affluent consumers can still afford to buy these automobiles no matter how much tariff the government imposes. So, the very reason for an import tariff is kind of defeated in this case. If the consumer wishes to buy the car at any cost, he can do so by paying extra, thereby causing a downturn for domestic manufacturers and a net welfare loss to the domestic consumers as well (i.e. reduction in consumer surplus is more than the increase in producer surplus)

Let's see the supply curve after a tariff is imposed.

P1 is the price when imports were allowed without the tariff. Due to cheaper imports, the price is less than the equilibrium price P and thus demand increases from Q to Q2. As a result, share of domestic producers' fall from Q to Q1 as shown in the figure above. After a tariff imposition, the market share of domestic suppliers increases from Q1 to Q4. Although this doesn't bring back the original market share Q of the domestic suppliers.

Let's take a view at the supply curve after an import quota is imposed by the Malaysian government.

As you can see, the market share of the domestic consumers increase from Q2 before import Quota to Q4 - (Q3 - Q2) after import quota. The quota for imports is Q3 - Q2 in this case. The market share considerably increases when compared to the tariff system, that to with little to no welfare loss for consumers, but of course a loss in tax revenue for the government. But as far as the agenda of improving market share of domestic markets is concerned, import quotas will be a viable option.

Hope this helps. Do hit the thumbs up. Cheers!


Related Solutions

It is more efficient for the government of a small country to impose an import tariff...
It is more efficient for the government of a small country to impose an import tariff than a production subsidy to stimulate output because it does not have to pay the producers directly. Comment and Explain why?
How does an import quota differ from a tariff? Can the government ever capture the quota...
How does an import quota differ from a tariff? Can the government ever capture the quota rent? If so, how?
When the government of Tradeland decides to impose arn import quota on foreign cars, three proposals...
When the government of Tradeland decides to impose arn import quota on foreign cars, three proposals are sug gested: (1) Sell the import licences in an auction. (2) Distribute the licences randomly in a lottery. (3) Let peo- ple wait in line and distribute the licences on a first- come, first-served basis. Compare the effects of these policies. Which policy do you think has the largest deadweight losses? Which policy has the smallest deadweight losses? Why? (Hint: the government's other...
Suppose that instead of tariff, a quota is imposed, explain the disadvantages in terms of government...
Suppose that instead of tariff, a quota is imposed, explain the disadvantages in terms of government revenue, and consumer welfare.
What do the welfare effects of an import quota differ from those of import tariff?
What do the welfare effects of an import quota differ from those of import tariff?
Q3. Which is a more restrictive trade barrier—an import tariff or an equivalent import quota? Why...
Q3. Which is a more restrictive trade barrier—an import tariff or an equivalent import quota? Why did the U.S. government in 1982 provide import quotas as an aid to domestic sugar producers?
Suppose that the government imposes quota of 70% of the current import amount. Do the following:...
Suppose that the government imposes quota of 70% of the current import amount. Do the following: a. Plot a graph to show the effects of the quota. b. Show the new areas of consumer surplus, producer surplus, and any other relevant areas. c. Show the deadweight losses due to the quota. d. Who wins and who loses from the quota?
Problem 4 “An import quota and a tariff have exactly the same effect on price, and...
Problem 4 “An import quota and a tariff have exactly the same effect on price, and bring the same gains and losses, provided that the import quota restricts imports just as much as the tariff.” Indicate one situation in which this statement is true, and another situation in which this statement is false.
2. (i) First describe in general, a tariff and an import quota. (ii) What are the...
2. (i) First describe in general, a tariff and an import quota. (ii) What are the primary differences between them? (iii) Using a diagram for each, show how an increase in demand would affect such macroeconomic variables as (a) the price, (b) imports, (c) domestic production and (d) government revenue, much as we did in class. Be sure to show these effects on your two graphs.
What is import quota? Why do some governments use it instead of just using tariff to...
What is import quota? Why do some governments use it instead of just using tariff to restrict imports by the same amounts? Is it because quota brings a bigger national gain than tariff?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT