Question

In: Finance

11.1 The Woodsons Struggle with Two Investment Goals Like many married couples, Damian and Brandi Woodson...

11.1 The Woodsons Struggle with Two Investment Goals Like many married couples, Damian and Brandi Woodson are trying their best to save for two impor- tant investment objectives: (1) an education fund to put their two children through college; and (2) a retirement nest egg for themselves. They want to set aside $100,000 per child by the time each one starts college. Given that their children are now 10 and 12 years old, Damian and Brandi have 6 years remaining for one child and 8 for the other. As far as their retirement plans are concerned, the Wood- sons both hope to retire in 20 years, when they reach age 65. Both Damian and Brandi work, and together, they currently earn about $90,000 a year. The Woodsons started a college fund some years ago by investing $6,000 a year in bank CDs. That fund is now worth $65,000. They also have $50,000 that they received from an inheritance invested in several mutual funds and another $20,000 in a tax-sheltered retirement account. Damian and Brandi believe that they’ll be able to continue putting away $6,000 a year for the next 20 years. In fact, Brandi thinks they’ll be able to put away even more, particularly after the children are out of school. The Wood- sons are fairly conservative investors and feel they can probably earn about 6 percent on their money. (Ignore taxes for the purpose of this exercise.) Critical Thinking Questions 1. Use Worksheet 11.1 to determine whether the Woodsons have enough money right now to meet their children’s educational needs. That is, will the $65,000 they’ve accumulated so far be enough to put their children through school, given they can invest their money at 6 percent? Remember, they want to have $100,000 set aside for each child by the time each one starts college. 11-1 worksheet DETERMINING AMOUNT OF INVESTMENT CAPITAL Financial goal: 1. Targeted Financial Goal (see Note 1) ­­­_____ 2. Projected Average Return on Investments: A. Finding a Lump Sum Investment: 3. Future Value Factor, from Appendix A based on ___________ years to target date and a projected average return on investment of ____%______ 0.000 4. Required Lump Sum Investment line 1/ line 3 = $0 B. Making a Series of Investments over Time: 5. Amount of Initial Investment, if any (see Note 2) ___ 6. Future Value Factor, from Appendix A based on _____ years of target date and a projected average return on investment of ___ = _____ 7. Terminal Value of Initial Investment line 5 x line 6 = $ ___ 8. Balance to Come from Savings Plan line 1 - line 7 = $ ____ 9. Future Value Annuity Factor, from Appendix B return on investment of ______ based on ______ years to target date and a projected average __% = ___ 10. Series of Annual Investments Required over Time line 8 /line 9 = $_____ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Note 1: The “targeted financial goal” is the amount of money you want to accumulate by some target date in the future. Note 2: If you’re starting from scratch—that is, there is no initial investment—enter zero on line 5, skip lines 6 and 7, and then use the total targeted financial goal (from line 1) as the amount to be funded from a savings plan; now proceed with the rest of the worksheet. 2. Regarding their retirement nest egg, assume that no additions are made to either the $50,000 they now have in mutual funds or to the $20,000 in the retirement account. How much would these investments be worth in 20 years, given that they can earn 6 percent? 3. Now, if the Woodsons can invest $6,000 a year for the next 20 years and apply all of that to their retirement nest egg, how much would they be able to accumulate given their 6 percent rate of return? 4. How do you think the Woodsons are doing with regard to meeting their twin investment objec- tives? Explain.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Soln : 1. Targeted Financial Goal $100000*2 = $200000 ­

2. Projected Average Return on Investments 6%: A. Finding a Lump Sum Investment 200000: 3. Future Value Factor = 1.066 , from Appendix A based on 6 years to target date and a projected average return on investment of 6% 4. Required Lump Sum Investment line 1/ line 3 = $200000/1.066 = $140992 B. Making a Series of Investments over Time: 5. Amount of Initial Investment, if any (see Note 2) 65000 6. Future Value Factor, from Appendix A based on 6 years of target date and a projected average return on investment of 6% = 1.066 = 1.42 7. Terminal Value of Initial Investment line 5 x line 6 = $65000*1.066 = $92204 8. Balance to Come from Savings Plan line 1 - line 7 = $ 48788.00 9. Future Value Annuity Factor, from Appendix B return on investment of based on 6 years to target date and a projected average 6% = (1.066 -1)/0.06 = 6.975 10. Series of Annual Investments Required over Time line 8 /line 9 = $ 48788/6.975 = 6994.43


Related Solutions

A random sample of 364 married couples found that 288 had two or more personality preferences...
A random sample of 364 married couples found that 288 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 588 married couples, it was found that only 30 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 90% confidence interval for...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 371...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 371 married couples found that 130 had three preferences in common. Another random sample of 573 couples showed that 219 had two personality preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have three personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 90% confidence...
A random sample of 366 married couples found that 292 had two or more personality preferences...
A random sample of 366 married couples found that 292 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 552 married couples, it was found that only 20 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 95% confidence interval for...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 374...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 374 married couples found that 128 had three preferences in common. Another random sample of 558 couples showed that 200 had two personality preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have three personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 95% confidence...
Question 1. Below is the information about the well-being of two married couples considering divorce. They...
Question 1. Below is the information about the well-being of two married couples considering divorce. They live in Pandaland - a society where divorce will only be granted if the wife asks for it. Assume perfectly transferable utility and that there are no transaction costs for b and c. Couple 1 Couple 2 Current Marital Output/Utility H=10; W=10 H=10; W=10 Expected Single Output/Utility H=5; W=12 H=9; W=14 a. What is the Coase Theorem? b. Will Couple 1 get divorced? Why...
A random sample of 376 married couples found that 296 had two or more personality preferences...
A random sample of 376 married couples found that 296 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 586 married couples, it was found that only 20 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 95% confidence interval for...
A random sample of 380 married couples found that 284 had two or more personality perferences...
A random sample of 380 married couples found that 284 had two or more personality perferences in common. In another random sample of 566 married couples, it was found that only 24 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 90% confidence interval for...
A random sample of 366 married couples found that 286 had two or more personality preferences...
A random sample of 366 married couples found that 286 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 552 married couples, it was found that only 38 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 90% confidence interval for...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 375...
Most married couples have two or three personality preferences in common. A random sample of 375 married couples found that 134 had three preferences in common. Another random sample of 573 couples showed that 215 had two personality preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have three personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two personality preferences in common. (a) Find a 90% confidence...
1a. What is the significance of the fact that 2 of 3 of the married couples...
1a. What is the significance of the fact that 2 of 3 of the married couples with no children at home are over 50? What market opportunities will that create? 1b. Couples are having fewer children, and are beginning to have children later. What effect will these changes have on society, schools and businesses?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT