Question

In: Physics

Been studying hopping conduction and something that everyone is taking for granted is bothering me. Let's...

Been studying hopping conduction and something that everyone is taking for granted is bothering me.

Let's say we have a bunch of sites that are either unoccupied, singly occupied, or doubly occupied. Due to on-site Coulomb repulsion the two electron levels are separated by U energy at a doubly occupied site. Now everyone is saying that the two electrons on the double site are in the spin singlet state due to, I assume, Pauli exclusion. However the two electrons are not in the same energy level - they are separated by U so why is there a restriction on their spins?

Solutions

Expert Solution

4tnemele's answer is great, but I thought I'd try to give a simpler explanation of the main point of confusion.

Let's say (as in 4tnemele's answer) that there's only one relevant orbital (or "energy level") at each site. That means there's two states a single electron can occupy: spin up and spin down.

Also, let's say there's no magnetic field.

You say "Due to on-site Coulomb repulsion the two electron levels are separated by U energy at a doubly occupied site." This is wrong, because there is only one "level" (orbital), not two. The Coulomb energy penalty U only applies if there are two electrons in that level, one spin up and one spin down.

At a doubly occupied site, the overall energy is increased by U, but that energy doesn't belong to one electron or the other. It comes from the interaction between the electrons. At a doubly occupied site, the two electrons still have exactly the same spatial wavefunction. The many-body wavefunction is spatially symmetric. This is why the spins have to be opposite.

So the basic problem is that you shouldn't say "the two electron levels are separated by U". Instead you should say "the state with two electrons at the same site is increased in energy by U relative to what you'd otherwise expect (twice the single-electron energy)".


Related Solutions

Could someone explain how to solve this for me? We have been studying fluoride in drinking...
Could someone explain how to solve this for me? We have been studying fluoride in drinking water. If you were to examine your toothpaste one of the active ingredient is most likely to be sodium fluoride. Given theinformation below write the equation associated with each one of the following energies,daw the Born Haber Cycle and calculate the lattice energy for the formation of Sodiumfluoride. First Ionization energy of Na: 496 kJ/molFirst Electron affinity of F: –328 kJ/mol Enthalpy of atomization...
Dear Expert. I have been studying about Statistical Process Control. And my professor required me to...
Dear Expert. I have been studying about Statistical Process Control. And my professor required me to collect the data from real manufacturing in Taiwan. I wonder how can I make a plan in Data collection for SPC. This manufacturing product ordered product ( house door, ventilator, window, etc...). The main raw material is steel. I had gone there last week and seen how it work. I already know what kind of machine and part I need to collect. But the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT