In: Finance
Based on the information provided below, Should the company proceed with the investment? Use NPV & IRR to evaluate the project.
Old Machine Proposed new Machine
Asset cost $150,000 $180,000
Age of machine 10 years 0 years
Useful Life 15 years 5 years
Salvage value $15,000 0
Revenue $500,000 $550,000
Maintenance cost $6,000 $10,000
Electricity cost $20,000 $25,000
Shipping cost - $6,000
Freight insurance - $2,000
Installation & Commissioning expense - $12,000
Working capital:
Cash $15,000 $25,000
Trade debtors $30,000 $40,000
Inventory $24,000 $34,000
Trade creditors $40,000 $50,000
Accruals $10,000 $15,000
Current portion of long-term Loan $8,919 $15,977
Long-term Loan (non-current portion) $46,435 $84,022
Interest rate 10.75% 11.25%
Interest Expense $7,539 $11,250
Instalment payment $16,458 $27,227
Depreciation is on straight-line method. The current machine can be sold today for $75,000. The new machine can reduce labour by cutting cost from $36,000 to $30,000 a year. The estimated selling price of the new machine at the end of its useful life is $35,000. Should company proceed with the replacement, they have to use their other factory lot now leased to a third party for $700 per month. The company spent $30,000 on rewiring/renovation of the factory now leased to the third party. It is expected that only 90% of company’s investment in working capital will be recovered. Company’s tax rate is 40% and its WACC is 11.00%
For solving this problem firstly net wrorking capital is calculated after which EBIDTA is calculated and then the rest of the calculations as given in the below snapshots are done. The final answer is not to replace the machine as NPV of free cash flows and the IRR as well are negative so no benefit will be obtained from replacing the machine.
The first image explains the working of net working capital along with the amount spent at 0th interval i.e. at the time of installation of new machine
This image explains the rest of the workings which shows that overall the NPV and the IRR for the project is negative hence the asset should not be replaced. One thing not taken into account is the opportunity cost, there can be some opportunity cost as well involved but just for the sake of simplicity it is not taken into account.