Question

In: Finance

Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $230,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...

Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $230,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. Holmes would use the 3-year MACRS method to depreciate the machine, and management thinks the machine would have a value of $26,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. The applicable depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. Net operating working capital would increase by $24,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 40%, and a 12% WACC is appropriate for the project.

  1. Assume management is unsure about the $90,000 cost savings-this figure could deviate by as much as plus or minus 20%. What would the NPV be under each of these situations? Round your answers to the nearest cent. Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign.

    20% savings increase. $

    20% savings decrease. $

  2. Suppose the CFO wants you to do a scenario analysis with different values for the cost savings, the machine's salvage value, and the net operating working capital (NOWC) requirement. She asks you to use the following probabilities and values in the scenario analysis:
    Scenario Probability Cost Savings Salvage Value NOWC
    Worst case 0.35 $72,000 $21,000 $29,000
    Base case 0.35 90,000 26,000 24,000
    Best case 0.30 108,000 31,000 19,000

    Calculate the project's expected NPV, its standard deviation, and its coefficient of variation. Round your answers to two decimal places.

    E(NPV) = $

    σNPV = $

    CV =

please help!Thank you!

Solutions

Expert Solution

Base case
a..Cost savings 90000
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
1.Initial cost -230000
2.NC introd.& recove. -24000 24000
3.After-tax cost savings(90000*(1-40%)) 54000 54000 54000 54000 54000
4.Depn. Tax shields(230000*dep.%*40%) 30360 41400 13800 6440
5.After-tax salvage(26000*(1-40%) 15600
6.Total annual FCFs(1+2+3+4+5) -254000 84360 95400 67800 60440 93600
7. PV F at 12%(1/1.12^Yr.n) 1 0.89286 0.79719 0.71178 0.63552 0.56743
8.PV at 12%(6*7) -254000 75321.43 76052.30 48258.70 38410.71 53111.15
9.NPV(sum of row 8) 37154.29

Changing values for cost savings in the above table,following values of NPVs are obtained

ANSWER:a Cost savings NPV
20% savings increase. $ 90000*(1+20%)= 108000 76086
20% savings decrease. $ 90000*(1-20%)=72000 -1777
Worst case
b .Cost savings 72000 Cost Savings Salvage Value NOWC
$72,000 $21,000 $29,000
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
1.Initial cost -230000
2.NC introd.& recove. -29000 29000
3.After-tax cost savings(90000*(1-40%)) 43200 43200 43200 43200 43200
4.Depn. Tax shields(230000*dep.%*40%) 30360 41400 13800 6440
5.After-tax salvage(21000*(1-40%) 12600
6.Total annual FCFs(1+2+3+4+5) -259000 73560 84600 57000 49640 84800
7. PV F at 12%(1/1.12^Yr.n) 1 0.89286 0.79719 0.71178 0.63552 0.56743
8.PV at 12%(6*7) -259000 65678.57 67442.60 40571.47 31547.12 48117.80
9.NPV(sum of row 8) -5642.44
BEST Case Cost Savings Salvage Value NOWC
b.3Cost savings 108000 108,000 31,000 19,000
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
1.Initial cost -230000
2.NC introd.& recove. -19000 19000
3.After-tax cost savings(90000*(1-40%)) 64800 64800 64800 64800 64800
4.Depn. Tax shields(230000*dep.%*40%) 30360 41400 13800 6440
5.After-tax salvage(31000*(1-40%) 18600
6.Total annual FCFs(1+2+3+4+5) -249000 95160 106200 78600 71240 102400
7. PV F at 12%(1/1.12^Yr.n) 1 0.89286 0.79719 0.71178 0.63552 0.56743
8.PV at 12%(6*7) -249000 84964.29 84661.99 55945.93 45274.31 58104.51
9.NPV(sum of row 8) 79951.02
Summary
Scenario Prob. NPV
Worst case 35% -5642.44
Base case 35% 37154.29
Best Case 20% 79951.02
Project's Expected NPV= Sum of (Probablities*NPV at that prob.)
ie. (35%-5642.44)+(35%*37154.29)+(20%*79951.02)=
23352.12
Std. deviation = Sq,rt. Of ( sum of prob.*squared deviations from the expected Std. dev.)
ie.Sq. rt.of ((-5642.44-23352.12)^2*35%)+((37154.29-23352.12)^2*35%)+((79951.02-23352.12)^2*20%)=
(((-5642.44-23352.12)^2*35%)+((37154.29-23352.12)^2*35%)+((79951.02-23352.12)^2*20%))^(1/2)=
31648.09
Coefficient of variation=
Std. devn/Expected NPV
ie. 31648.09/23352.12=
1.36

Related Solutions

Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $200,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $200,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. Holmes would use the 3-year MACRS method to depreciate the machine, and management thinks the machine would have a value of $27,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. The applicable depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. Net operating working capital would increase by $24,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $21,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $26,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $20,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $26,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and a 10%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $21,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $26,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $23,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $25,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $23,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $25,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $23,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $25,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $270,000 and would reduce pretax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. The new machine will be fully depreciated at the time of purchase. Management thinks the machine would have a value of $23,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. Net operating working capital would increase by $25,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Holmes's marginal tax rate is 25%, and an 11%...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $250,000 and would reduce pre-tax manufacturing costs...
Holmes Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $250,000 and would reduce pre-tax manufacturing costs by $90,000 annually. Holmes would use the 3-year MACRS method to depreciate the machine, and management thinks the machine would have a value of $25,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. The applicable depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. Net operating working capital would increase by $25,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year...
Madison Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $350,000 and would reduce pre-tax manufacturing costs...
Madison Manufacturing is considering a new machine that costs $350,000 and would reduce pre-tax manufacturing costs by $110,000 annually. Madison would use the 3-year MACRS method to depreciate the machine, and management thinks the machine would have a value of $33,000 at the end of its 5-year operating life. The applicable depreciation rates are 33.33%, 44.45%, 14.81%, and 7.41%. Working capital would increase by $35,000 initially, but it would be recovered at the end of the project's 5-year life. Madison's...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT