Can following BNF convert to CFG (Context Free Grammar) <Boolean_expr> → <Boolean_expr>||<Boolean_term>|<Boolean_term> <Boolean _term> → <Boolean...

Can following BNF convert to CFG (Context Free Grammar)

<Boolean_expr> → <Boolean_expr>||<Boolean_term>|<Boolean_term>
<Boolean _term> → <Boolean _term> && <Boolean _factor>| <Boolean _factor>
<Boolean _factor> →ID | !<Boolean _factor>| (<Boolean _factor>) |<relation_expr>
<relation_expr> → ID==ID | ID !=ID | ID < ID | ID≤ID | ID>ID | ID>=ID

The above BNF is for Boolean Expression and Relational Expression.

Expert Solution

I have completed this problem Please give thumbs up if you like it

Step 1 what is CFG

Step 2

Given BNF grammar is

<Boolean_expr> → <Boolean_expr>||<Boolean_term>|<Boolean_term>
<Boolean _term> → <Boolean _term> && <Boolean _factor>| <Boolean _factor>
<Boolean _factor> →ID | !<Boolean _factor>| (<Boolean _factor>) |<relation_expr>
<relation_expr> → ID==ID | ID !=ID | ID < ID | ID≤ID | ID>ID | ID>=ID

The above BNF is for Boolean Expression and Relational Expression.

Step 3

Now convert this BNF into CNF form

This grammar is for both boolean expression and relational expression

venereology answered 6 months ago

For each of the following grammars, first classify the grammar as Regular, Linear, Context-Free or Context-Sensitive,...

For each of the following grammars, first classify the grammar as Regular, Linear, Context-Free or Context-Sensitive, and then precisely describe the language generated by the grammar. (1) S → aRa R → aR | bR | є (2) S → A | B A → aaaA | є B → Bbb | b (3) S → RbR R → aRb | bRa | RR | bR | є (4) S → aSbSaS | aSaSbS | bSaSaS | є (5)...

What makes a deterministic context free grammar deterministic?

Theory of Computation Problem Let G be an arbitrary CFG (Context-free Grammer), and let DG be...

Theory of Computation Problem Let G be an arbitrary CFG (Context-free Grammer), and let DG be the string-pushing PDA(pushdown automata) for it. Let w be some string of length n in L(G). Suppose you know that the leftmost derivation of w in G consists of m substitutions. How many transitions would be in the corresponding computation of DG for input string w? Justify your answer carefully.

Let G = (AN , AT , S, P) be a context-free grammar in Chomsky normal...

Let G = (AN , AT , S, P) be a context-free grammar in Chomsky normal form. Prove that if there exists a word w ∈ L(G) generated by a derivation that uses more than |P| + |AT | steps, then L(G) is infinite.

Prove that if G is a context-free grammar in which every variable occurs on the left...

Prove that if G is a context-free grammar in which every variable occurs on the left side of at most one production, then G is unambiguous.

Find Consider the following context-free grammar G: S --> T#T T --> C A --> aA...

Find Consider the following context-free grammar G: S --> T#T T --> C A --> aA | epsilon B --> bB | epsilon C --> cC C --> c a) Give the set of unproductive symbols in G? b) Give an equivalent grammar without useless symbols.

For an example BNF grammar, be able to identify the tokens which a lexical analyzer would...

For an example BNF grammar, be able to identify the tokens which a lexical analyzer would be able to produce. For an example BNF grammar, and a list of tokens, construct a state diagram of the language’s lexical analyzer.

Give a context-free grammar for {w ∈ {b, c}∗| #c(w) = #b(w)}.

Consider the context-free grammar G = ( {S}, {a, b}, S, P) where P = {...

Consider the context-free grammar G = ( {S}, {a, b}, S, P) where P = { S -> aaSb | aab }. Construct a NPDA M that such that L(M) = L(G). I would like the transition graph for this NPDA please.

Let G be any context-free grammar. Show that the number of strings that have a derivation...

Let G be any context-free grammar. Show that the number of strings that have a derivation in G of length n or less, for any n > 0, is finite. Could you please answer with clear explanation. The question is from Elaine Rich's Automata, Computability and Complexity Chapter 11 Exercise 14.

Question