Question

In: Accounting

Maria, who owns a 50% interest in a partnership operating a restaurant, had been a material...

Maria, who owns a 50% interest in a partnership operating a restaurant, had been a material participant in the restaurant activity for each of the last 20 years. She retired from working at the restaurant at the end of last year and no longer participates in the restaurant operations in any way. She is also a 50% partner in a retail store business in whose operations she has never participated. The retail store operations produce a loss for the current year, and Maria’s share of the loss is $80,000. Her share of the income from the restaurant is $150,000. She does not own interests in any other activities and her only other source of income or loss is $15,000 in interest from bonds she owns.

a. Maria can deduct $15,000 of the loss from the retail store against the $15,000 in interest income.

b. Maria can offset the entire $80,000 loss from the retail store against the $150,000 of restaurant income.

c. Maria may not offset any of the $80,000 loss from the retail store against income of the restaurant or her interest income.

d. Assuming Maria continues to hold the interest in the restaurant, she will always treat the income or losses as active.

e. None of the above is correct.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer:

Option b is correct

Explanation:

Option A is incorrect because Maria cannot deduct the $15,000 of the loss from the retail store against the $15,000 in interest income

Option B Maria can offset the $80,000 retail store loss against the $150,000 of restaurant income is correct because Maria materially participated in the restaurant activity for at least 5 of the last 10 taxable years before the current year, she is still considered an active participant in the activity. Therefore, her loss is an active loss that can be offset against her active income from the retail store.

Option C is incorrect because Maria will be able to deduct any passive activity losses from the retail store against income of the restaurant until she has been retired and inactive in the restaurant business for at least six years.

Option D is incorrect because  assuming Maria continues to hold the interest in the restaurant, she will not be able to treat the income or losses as active.


Related Solutions

Fern, Inc. Ivy, Inc. and Jeremy formed a general partnership. Fern owns a 50% interest, and...
Fern, Inc. Ivy, Inc. and Jeremy formed a general partnership. Fern owns a 50% interest, and Ivy and Jeremy both own 25% interests. Fern, Inc. files its tax return on an October 31 year-end; Ivy, Inc. files with a May 31 year-end, and Jeremy is a calendar year taxpayer. Which of the following statements is true regarding the taxable year the partnership can choose?
Ms. Kim is a general partner who holds a 50% interest in the Mustang Partnership. This...
Ms. Kim is a general partner who holds a 50% interest in the Mustang Partnership. This year, Mustang earned an ordinary business income of $200,000 before accounting for any payments to partners. Mustang also received $8,000 in qualified dividend income and $3,000 of municipal bond interest income. During the year, Mustang paid Ms. Kim a $60,000 guaranteed payment for services to the partnership plus an additional cash distribution of $30,000(assume Mustang made no payments to any other partner). Ms. Kim’s...
1. Tom owns a Pizza Restaurant. Expenses for the restaurant include raw material for pizza at...
1. Tom owns a Pizza Restaurant. Expenses for the restaurant include raw material for pizza at $6.43 per slice, $142.00 as monthly rental and $51.00 monthly as insurance. A restaurant sells pizza at a rate of $11.43/slice. How many slices should the restaurant sell in a month to break even? 2. You run a nail salon. Fixed monthly cost is $5,595.00 for rent and utilities, $5,643.00 is spent in salaries and $1,487.00 in insurance. Also every customer requires approximately $2.00...
Ms. Kim is a general partner who holds a 50% interest in Mustang Partnership. This year,...
Ms. Kim is a general partner who holds a 50% interest in Mustang Partnership. This year, Mustang earned ordinary business income of $200,000 before accounting for any payments to partners. Mustang also received $8,000 in qualified dividend income and $3,000 of municipal bond interest income. During the year, Mustang paid Ms. Kim a $60,000 guaranteed payment for services to the partnership plus an additional cash distribution of $30,000 (assume Mustang made no payments to any other partner). Ms. Kim’s ordinary...
If the parties had been operating as a limited liability partnership, how would that have changed...
If the parties had been operating as a limited liability partnership, how would that have changed the result? Why did the court find that there was no limited liability partnership? How does general partnership law treat a debt by one partner incurred in the course of partnership business? Here, as in the case in Section 42.4.2 "Liability Issues in LLCs", there really is no inequitable result. Why is this true?
Fred contributes cash of $350,000 to Strumble Partnership for his 50% interest in the partnership. For...
Fred contributes cash of $350,000 to Strumble Partnership for his 50% interest in the partnership. For his 50% interest Gary contibutes a building with a fairmarket value of $550,000 and a basis of $250,000. The building is subject to a mortgage of $200,000. Net income for Strumble for 2019 is $100,000, Strumble borrows an additional $50,000 during 2019 and makes a distribution to each partner of $20,000. Assuming that the partners share profits and losses equally what is Gary's basis...
Dad owns a 60% interest in the Consulting Services Partnership in which capital is not a...
Dad owns a 60% interest in the Consulting Services Partnership in which capital is not a material income producing factor. Two other unrelated partners each own 20% of the partnership. His son, Bill, worked for the partnership on a part-time basis while in college and has shown a strong aptitude for the business. Dad wants to retire but needs to cash in his partnership interest for its $850,000 value as soon as possible in order to do so. He wants...
Anthony is a chef who owns a small restaurant in Cleveland, Ohio as a sole proprietor....
Anthony is a chef who owns a small restaurant in Cleveland, Ohio as a sole proprietor. Because the business is struggling in the beginning, Anthony frequently puts money from his own personal account into the business account for the restaurant. After a while, business is picking up and he decides to expand by purchasing a food truck. In the beginning he is able to run the food truck during the day, and then open his restaurant just in the evening...
Rick and Maria had been married for 20 years before their divorce in the current year....
Rick and Maria had been married for 20 years before their divorce in the current year. At that time, they made the usual property settlement: Maria got the house, the van, and the cat; Rick got the mortgage, the Ford, and the dog. Other property was divided equally with the exception of the following: At the time of their divorce, Maria had instituted a number of lawsuits against various fast-food chains for infringement of her patent on an automated burrito-stuffing...
Mr. Leo Supreme owns a pizza restaurant. He is currently operating on a takeaway basis only....
Mr. Leo Supreme owns a pizza restaurant. He is currently operating on a takeaway basis only. He has several employees working in the kitchen and delivering pizzas. He also owns various assets, including a rental property. Luigi is Leo’s head chef and he is provided with the use of a Toyota RAV4 motor car as well as his salary of $100,000 per year. The car was purchased by Leo on 1 April 2018 for $55,000. Leo has not made the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT