Question

In: Operations Management

Some believe that tough environmental regulations add costs, reduce firm competitiveness, and drive some firms to...

Some believe that tough environmental regulations add costs, reduce firm competitiveness, and drive some firms to invest elsewhere. Others argue that tough environmental regulations force firms to be innovative and thus enhance competition and competitiveness. What do you think?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Tough environmental regulations definitely add to the costs and reduce productivity in the short run, thereby reducing firm competitiveness and also force some companies to shift elsewhere because of expensive technology and overall increased costs, but the advantages of having strict environmental regulations overweigh the problems that arise, when they are imposed.

Some of the major advantages of such regulations are that the environment is less harmed, the companies are forced to think of better and innovative technologies and ideas, that in the long run are very benefitial. The compeitiveness is increased as other companies also make an initiative to come up with more eco-friendly ideas of operations, thereby reducing the harmful impacts on the environment. The companies are motivated to invest in clean technology, that is beneficial  for the overall environment, as well as the people working in the firm. Many companies are able to balance the expenses of such strict regulations in the long run, making the business successful.


Related Solutions

8. Who pays the cost of regulations that require polluting firms to reduce their emissions.
8. Who pays the cost of regulations that require polluting firms to reduce their emissions.
The u.s government should or should not reduce environment regulations to promote economic growth. how environmental...
The u.s government should or should not reduce environment regulations to promote economic growth. how environmental regulation stimulating technological innovation ? how does environmental regulations benefit the companies ? how does " green economy " created more jobs nowadays ? how does  environmental regulations and technological innovation be complementary ?
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA =...
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA = 4AA and MCB = AB, where AA and AB are the tons of emissions abated by firm A and B, respectively. a. Calculate the total cost if each firm is required to abate 50 tons of emissions. b. Would this policy be cost effective and why? c. What if the government set the total abatement to be 100 tons with tradable allowances, what is...
Ethics in Accounting and Business Question Believe it or not, some accounting and financial service Firms...
Ethics in Accounting and Business Question Believe it or not, some accounting and financial service Firms perform a multitude of screening tests during recruitment, including drugs testing and lie detector tests. Some Firms go further and screen work emails and phone calls. Where do you think companies/firms cross a line, if they do at all? Why? Is monitoring of Employees good corporate governance practice?
Two firms can reduce emissions of an air pollutant at the following marginal costs: MAC1 =...
Two firms can reduce emissions of an air pollutant at the following marginal costs: MAC1 = 500q1 MAC2 = 300q2 (1) where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firm. Total abatement cost functions for the two firms are, respectively: TAC1 = 1000 + 250(q1)^2 TAC2 = 1000 + 150(q^2) (2) Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80...
Regulators may impose political costs on firms. However , there are ways that some firms practice...
Regulators may impose political costs on firms. However , there are ways that some firms practice to minimise such costs. Discuss with examples.
Regulators may impose political costs on firms. However , there are ways that some firms practice...
Regulators may impose political costs on firms. However , there are ways that some firms practice to minimise such costs. Discuss with examples. (please provide examples also in order to cut)
Economics Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels Firm A’s...
Economics Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC=20+4Q and firm B’s MC=10+8Q The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB=400-4Q Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: require all firms to reduce pollution by the same amount; charge a common tax per unit of pollution; or require all firms to reduce pollution by the same amount, but allow pollution permits to be bought...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 20 + 4Q. Firm B's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 10 + 8Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 400 –40. a. What is the socially optimal level of each firm's pollution reduction? b. Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: (1) require all firms to reduce pollu-...
a) Some companies believe in the integration of HRM and Payroll systems. However, many firms do...
a) Some companies believe in the integration of HRM and Payroll systems. However, many firms do not agree with this integration. These companies maintain separate HRM information systems and Payroll. Required: Discuss both arguments. For this discussion, think in terms of (1) difference in employee background, and (2) functions performed by the HRM and payroll departments. [7 marks] upto 200 words b) Mr Peter is the treasurer of a small charity and you asked him to explain the business activities...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT