Question

In: Psychology

Pretend that you have been called as an expert witness for the defense to discredit an...

Pretend that you have been called as an expert witness for the defense to discredit an eyewitness. Based on your knowledge of social psychological research, think of at least five reasons the eyewitness cannot be trusted. Cite psychological research and then use your creativity to explain how it applies to the case you are testifying for. In other words, explain the social psychological concept and then give an example of how something that happened to the eyewitness might suggest he is not the best witness. In addition, comment on which of the findings about eyewitness testimony you personally found the most surprising or interesting and why.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Below is an absolutely accurate answer.

Eyewitness testimony personally found are like as an Individuals keep information within the way that sounds smart to them. Mappings square degree therefore perfect mutilating new or inadvertently 'unsatisfactory' data thus on 'healthy in' with our current data or patterns. This can, in the course of this way, bring about unreliable viewer testimon.

Memory construction in different way-

It is a regular confusion that the human memory works sort of a video, allowing human beings to replay events in their psyches similarly as they happened. Even so, Scientific yank reviews that reminiscences rectangular measure recreated, not replayed. Or maybe, components of what human beings saw rectangular degree looked after out type of a riddle in their brains as they review memories. Later, addressing and analyzing an occurrence ought to amendment individuals' recollections, or their examine of what they saw.

Lineup problems-

Witnesses rectangular degree often approached to renowned suspects thru arrangements, every physical and pictures. within the occasion that the right techniques aren't followed, be that as it ought to, law authorization officers could accidentally show to witnesses United Nations employer they got to decide. As an example, if the pics used square measure various sizes or have one-of-a-kind lighting, it'd motive one man or woman's image to face aside over the others. At the reason as soon as the law demand operators leading the arrangement recognize United Nations employer the suspect is, they'll offer cooccurring signs to the observer.

-Visual features and characteristics-

Regularly, witnesses base their recognizable gadgets of proof off a speculate's characterizing highlights or qualities. In any case, wearing a garb, cap, glasses or opportunity mask may want to amendment however a personal appearance. Therefore, humans should mistake someone as a suspect, and consequently the individual in question could be seen as guilty of a wrongdoing, for instance, attack or murder, that they did now not submit. Moreover, racial contrasts among the observers and suspects should likewise affect recognizable items of proof.

Nervousness and stress-

Seeing a wrongdoing are often an ugly encounter. currently and as soon as more, the uneasiness people expertise due to such events ought to change their affect of whom or what they saw. this might set off off base special items.

Thanks


Related Solutions

You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on...
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on collision. Car A weighs 1515 lb and was traveling eastward. Car B weighs 1125 lb and was traveling westward at 47.0 mph. The cars locked bumpers and slid eastward with their wheels locked for 21.5 ft before stopping. You have measured the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the pavement to be 0.750. How fast (in miles per hour) was car A...
Suppose that you have been called as an expert witness for a defendant accused of robbing...
Suppose that you have been called as an expert witness for a defendant accused of robbing a bank. Prior to your being called as a witness, two bank tellers confidently identified the defendant as the robber. What research evidence might you introduce to the jury to caution them about assuming that the defendant must be guilty because he or she was identified in court?
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on...
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on collision. Car A weighs 1515 lb and was traveling eastward. Car B weighs 1125 lb and was traveling westward at 41.0 mph. The cars locked bumpers and slid eastward with their wheels locked for 18.5 ft before stopping. You have measured the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the pavement to be 0.750 . How fast (in miles per hour) was car...
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on...
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on collision. Car A weighs 1515 lb and was traveling eastward. Car B weighs 1125 lb and was traveling westward at 41.0 mph. The cars locked bumpers and slid eastward with their wheels locked for 18.5 ft before stopping. You have measured the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the pavement to be 0.750 . How fast (in miles per hour) was car...
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on collision.
You have been called to testify as an expert witness in a trial involving a head-on collision. Car A weighs 1515 lb and was traveling eastward. Car B weighs 1125 lb and was traveling westward at 47.0 mph. The cars locked bumpers and slid eastward with their wheels locked for 17.5 ft before stopping. You have measured the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the pavement to be 0.750. How fast (in miles per hour) was car A...
You have been hired as an expert witness by an attorney for a trial involving a...
You have been hired as an expert witness by an attorney for a trial involving a traffic accident. The attorney's client, the plaintiff in this case, was traveling eastbound toward an intersection at 13.2 m/s as measured just before the accident by a roadside speed meter, and as seen by a trustworthy witness. As the plaintiff entered the intersection, his car was struck by a northbound driver, the defendant in this case, driving a car with identical mass to the...
You have been hired as an expert witness by an attorney for a trial involving a...
You have been hired as an expert witness by an attorney for a trial involving a traffic accident. The attorney's client, the plaintiff in this case, was traveling eastbound toward an intersection at 13.8 m/s as measured just before the accident by a roadside speed meter, and as seen by a trustworthy witness. As the plaintiff entered the intersection, his car was struck by a northbound driver, the defendant in this case, driving a car with identical mass to the...
You have been hired as an expert witness in a case involving an automobile accident. The...
You have been hired as an expert witness in a case involving an automobile accident. The accident involved car A of mass 1500 kg, which crashed into stationary car B of mass 1100 kg. The driver of car A applied his brakes 15 m before he skidded into car B. After the collision, car A slid 18 m while car B slid 30 m before coming to rest. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the locked wheels and the road...
Assume you have been retained as an expert witness for a client who is the defendant...
Assume you have been retained as an expert witness for a client who is the defendant in the case, and your client is alleged to have breached a contract and caused damages of $3,000,000 which includes added costs and lost profits. The contract required that your client supply hardwood lumber to a furniture manufacturer for a three-year period. After six months your client found it could not supply the lumber in the quantity required by the plaintiff in the case...
You have been hired as an expert witness in a federal antitrust case. You are planning...
You have been hired as an expert witness in a federal antitrust case. You are planning your strategy for determining whether or not your client (the defendant in the case) has engaged in predatory pricing. How will you get started? In general what is your strategy? What must you do to successfully defend your client?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT