Question

In: Psychology

Please type down your response after reading the paragraphs.  (at least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words) I...

Please type down your response after reading the paragraphs.  (at least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words)

I think this is a very controversial topic but also, an hypothetical one. Who knows if everything could turn out fine and make this one of the greatest innovations of all time? Who knows if it's going to be a 'failure'?

In my point of view, dealing with AI is tricky. I feel that nothing should ever be done to reach the limits, specially when dealing with technology. However, it has to be done between the limits and be controllable. In the video, Sam Harris tells us that year after year we will improve our machines and eventually build machines that are way smarter than we are and that, eventually, they can improve by themselves. At this point, I feel like we've already crossed our limit and are susceptible to have an "intelligence explosion" and get this situation out of control. In this sensitive scenario, we should opt for the safer option and take our time to reevaluate our improvements so far and make it a slow process so that we can assure that none mistake or action is taken that can harm us in the future.

At this point and when talking about AI, risks and safety should always be concerning and always going to be present. As a consequence, our generation should realize that this is a big deal and reflect about it and decide (each time they want to make another improvement) if the risks that they are going to take are worth threatening our future existence and safety. In conclusion, I don't think there's a yes or no to this question and topic. However, it's definitely something that, in my point of view, needs to take its time and constantly reevaluate our situation, improvements, risks, but more importantly, our safety in a near future.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Hello!

So far as I was reading what you feel I think I will totally agree with your opinion to be alert before matters become much worse and also I do not find any negative impressions or opinions in your article , it is very persuasive as you have also provided proof above of what mat happen if we do not take care in the initial stages as we know if technology is able to become smarter than humans we obviously know that it is the end of many things and I also feel that everything used in a limit is fine and of you forget to follow the norms of nature , it will surely get you back .I love how small and compact your article or passage is yet it is very powerful as it completely awares a person of the dangers, the ways to prevent danger and also you have provided your own insight too and for me this article was very informative and powerful and compact and not boring by a bit.

Thankyou ,hope this helped!


Related Solutions

Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (at least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (at least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words) By Murphy’s Law, anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Throughout history, there have been multiple technological disasters due to errors in overlooking safety precautions, errors in manufacturing, or when a piece of the machinery simply gives out. The most advanced model of some sort of technology could be highly praised for its innovation, yet at some point, something is bound to go...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (At least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words.)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (At least 5 sentences long, 150-200 words.) In a situation where a driverless car is out of control and I am faced with killing myself or five pedestrians, I would sacrifice myself. When purchasing the vehicle, drivers are aware of the risks that come with it as machines are never 100% safe. Although driverless cars were manufactured with the intention of lowering the number of accidents on the road, this does...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraphs. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) I think that there is a very fine line between technology and human innovation. That fine line is when the technological innovation starts to harm humans. That is not the case here with Geraldine Hamilton’s organs on a chip. With this organ on a chip, there are no humans being hurt. She is using cells to try to stimulate accurate representations of a human...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) In my point of view, I believe that driverless car will definitely be the trend of technological development. Meanwhile, 100 percent security will be the target for all related companies. If those cars are mixed into human driven cars in the future, the outcome will be horrible. Even if the technique is well developed, the traffic in the real society is not expectable. There...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) While it may be obvious to some that saving more lives would be minimizing total harm, it becomes difficult when we begin to consider the value of each life at risk. We cannot necessarily say the value of the driver's life is less than the lives of the pedestrians simply because of quantity. If the driverless car kills the driver, then it will be...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) First of all, I would say the technology might not make 100% safety. Also, people should not be controlled by technology, and people should control technology because I think that only people, human, think molal. I want to respect moral for life. If I was in this situation weather driverless car kills me or five pedestrians, I would chose to kill myself and save...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) The idea of a driverless car in our modern day and age at first sounds very pleasant, if one does not think too hard about it. Much like how Iyad Rahwan mentions in his TED talk, about 1.6 million people die every year in traffic accidents, and oftentimes because of human error. If human error was taken away, wouldn’t this drastically decrease the number...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words)...
Please write down your response after reading the paragraph. (At least 5 sentences long. 150-200 words) Ethically, autonomous cars mixed together on the roads with human-operated cars raises a scary picture in my mind. If autonomous cars are running on the mindset of saving the greater good, and human operated cars are also on this roadway with the mindset of saving their own self… I am unsure of how that would turn out. It is a bit frightening to think...
Please respond in 2 (minimum 5 sentences each) paragraphs or I will tumbs down your response....
Please respond in 2 (minimum 5 sentences each) paragraphs or I will tumbs down your response. Contrast the elements necessary for a face-to-face and virtual group presentation. What are the most significant elements required for a virtual group presentation?
Please typle down (easy for me to copy and paste) your thoughts after reading the paragraphs...
Please typle down (easy for me to copy and paste) your thoughts after reading the paragraphs ie. agree or disagree and why? (Min 5 sentences 150 words + ) The talk given by Paul Kemp-Robertson was eyeopening and extremely revealing. Although he mentions the importance of cryptocurrencies and their rapid increase within society in the last years, I still do not believe that they will out date money, cash, debit cards or any of the payment methods that we currently...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT