In: Statistics and Probability
Diet |
|||
Exercise |
<30% fat |
30% - 60% fat |
>60% fat |
<60 minutes |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
60 minutes |
6 |
8 |
5 |
or more |
5 |
8 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
4 |
8 |
5 |
|
5 |
6 |
6 |
The results are:
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value |
Exercise | 90.13 | 1 | 90.133 | 135.20 | 2.39E-11 |
Diet | 6.20 | 2 | 3.100 | 4.65 | .0196 |
Interaction | 18.47 | 2 | 9.233 | 13.85 | .0001 |
Error | 16.00 | 24 | 0.667 | ||
Total | 130.80 | 29 |
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: There is no interaction effect of the amount of fat in the diet and amount of exercise on the mental acuity of middle-aged women
Ha: There is an interaction effect of the amount of fat in the diet and amount of exercise on the mental acuity of middle-aged women
The p-value from the output is 0.0001.
Since the p-value (0.0001) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we can conclude that there is an interaction effect of the amount of fat in the diet and amount of exercise on the mental acuity of middle-aged women.