Question

In: Advanced Math

Let X be Z or Q and define a logical formula p by ∀x ∈ X,...

Let X be Z or Q and define a logical formula p by ∀x ∈ X, ∃y ∈ X, (x < y ∧ [∀z ∈ X, ¬(x < z ∧ z < y)]).

Describe what p asserts about the set X. Find the maximally negated logical formula equivalent to ¬p. Prove that p is true when X = Z and false when X = Q

Expert Solution

Given statement , .

Now ,

That is does not lies between and .

So asserts , " For any number in there is a number in bigger than it and there is no number between them " .

While we negate an statement is been always replaced by and is beenreplaced by that is negation of is and negation of is .

Hence the negation of the given statement is ,

If .

For each integer if we choose then and therre is no integer between and as there is no integer between and .

So the statement is true for

If

Suppose then for any choosen such that . there will a rational number between and as between any two rational number there is an rational number . Explicitly we can choose then the condition will not be satisfies and so the statement is not true for .

.

..

.

If you have doubt or need more clarification at any step please comment .

Colby Messinger answered 15 hours ago

let R = Z x Z. P be the prime ideal {0} x Z and S...

let R = Z x Z. P be the prime ideal {0} x Z and S = R - P. Prove that S^-1R is isomorphic to Q.

Given the function u(p,q,r)=((p-q)/(q-r)), with p=x+y+z,q=x-y+z, and r=x+y-z, find the partial derivatives au/ax=, au/ay=, au/az=

prove or disprove using logical equivalences (a) p ∧ (q → r) ⇐⇒ (p → q)...

prove or disprove using logical equivalences (a) p ∧ (q → r) ⇐⇒ (p → q) → r (b) x ∧ (¬y ↔ z) ⇐⇒ ((x → y) ∨ ¬z) → (x ∧ ¬(y → z)) (c) (x ∨ y ∨ ¬z) ∧ (¬x ∨ y ∨ z) ⇐⇒ ¬y → (x ↔ z)

Let X, Y ⊂ Z and x, y ∈ Z Let A = (X\{x}) ∪ {x}....

Let X, Y ⊂ Z and x, y ∈ Z Let A = (X\{x}) ∪ {x}. a) Prove or disprove: A ⊆ X b) Prove or disprove: X ⊆ A c) Prove or disprove: P(X ∪ Y ) ⊆ P(X) ∪ P(Y ) ∪ P(X ∩ Y ) d) Prove or disprove: P(X) ∪ P(Y ) ∪ P(X ∩ Y ) ⊆ P(X ∪ Y )

Let X Geom(p). For positive integers n, k define P(X = n + k | X...

Let X Geom(p). For positive integers n, k define P(X = n + k | X > n) = P(X = n + k) / P(X > n) : Show that P(X = n + k | X > n) = P(X = k) and then briefly argue, in words, why this is true for geometric random variables.

Using logical equivalence laws, show that (((p v ~ q) ⊕ p) v ~p) ⊕ (p...

Using logical equivalence laws, show that (((p v ~ q) ⊕ p) v ~p) ⊕ (p v ~q) is equivalent to p v q. v = or, ~ = not, ⊕ = exclusive or (XOR). Please show the steps with the name of the law beside each step, thanks so much!

Let G = Z x Z and H = {(a, b) in Z x Z |...

Let G = Z x Z and H = {(a, b) in Z x Z | 8 divides a+b} a. Prove directly that H is a normal subgroup in G (use the fact that closed under composition and inverses) b. Prove that G/H is isomorphic to Z8. c. What is the index of [G : H]?

Let p and q be propositions. (i) Show (p →q) ≡ (p ∧ ¬q) →F (ii.)...

Let p and q be propositions. (i) Show (p →q) ≡ (p ∧ ¬q) →F (ii.) Why does this equivalency allow us to use the proof by contradiction technique?

The curried version of let f (x,y,z) = (x,(y,z)) is let f (x,(y,z)) = (x,(y,z)) Just...

The curried version of let f (x,y,z) = (x,(y,z)) is let f (x,(y,z)) = (x,(y,z)) Just f (because f is already curried) let f x y z = (x,(y,z)) let f x y z = x (y z)

Let P(x),Q(x),R(x), and S(x) be the statements “x is a duck,” “x is one of my...

Let P(x),Q(x),R(x), and S(x) be the statements “x is a duck,” “x is one of my poultry,” “x is an oﬃcer,” and “x is willing to waltz,” respectively. Express each of these statements using quantiﬁers, logical connectives, and the relations P(x),Q(x),R(x), and S(x). (a) No ducks are willing to waltz (b) No oﬃcers ever decline to waltz (c) All my poultry are ducks (d) My poultry are not oﬃcers (e) Does the fourth item follow from the ﬁrst three taken...