In: Finance
A company is analyzing two mutually exclusive projects, S and L, with the following cash flows:
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Project S | -$1,000 | $870.58 | $250 | $10 | $10 |
Project L | -$1,000 | $5 | $240 | $380 | $793.73 |
The company's WACC is 8.0%. What is the IRR of the better project? (Hint: The better project may or may not be the one with the higher IRR.) Round your answer to two decimal places.
Project S:
NPV = Present value of cash inflows - present value of cash outflows
NPV of project S = -1000 + 870.58 / ( 1 + 0.08)1 + 250 / ( 1 + 0.08)2 + 10 / ( 1 + 0.08)3 + 10 / ( 1 + 0.08)4
NPV of project S = $35.76
IRR is the rate of return that makes NPV equal to 0
-1000 + 870.58 / ( 1 + R)1 + 250 / ( 1 + R)2 + 10 / ( 1 + R)3 + 10 / ( 1 + R)4 = 0
Using trial and error method, i.e, after trying varuous values for R, let's try R as 11.1%
-1000 + 870.58 / ( 1 + 0.111)1 + 250 / ( 1 + 0.111)2 + 10 / ( 1 + 0.111)3 + 10 / ( 1 + 0.111)4 = 0
0 = 0
Therefore IRR of project S is 11.1%
Note: It is always recommended to use a financial calculator to calculate IRR. Trial and error method can be time consuming.
Project L:
NPV of project L = -1000 + 5 / ( 1 + 0.08)1 + 240 / ( 1 + 0.08)2 + 380 / ( 1 + 0.08)3 + 793.73 / ( 1 + 0.08)4
NPV of project L = $95.46
IRR is the rate of return that makes NPV equal to 0
-1000 + 5 / ( 1 + R)1 + 240 / ( 1 + R)2 + 380 / ( 1 + R)3 + 793.73 / ( 1 + R)4 = 0
Using trial and error method, i.e, after trying varuous values for R, let's try R as 11%
-1000 + 5 / ( 1 + 0.11)1 + 240 / ( 1 + 0.11)2 + 380 / ( 1 + 0.11)3 + 793.73 / ( 1 + 0.11)4 = 0
0 = 0
Therefore IRR of project L is 11%
When project are mutulally exclusive, we always go by the NPV rule. Project L is the better project as it has the higher NPV. IRR of project L is 11%.