In: Statistics and Probability
NIM Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95%
Conf. Interval]
size -.0034886 .0009923 -3.52 0.000
-.0054334 -.0015437
CapitalRatio .0135466 .0070876 1.91 0.056
-.0003449 .027438
LoanRatio .0045599 .0084585 0.54 0.590
-.0120185 .0211382
DEP .0174113 .0085273 2.04 0.041
.0006981 .0341244
LLP -.0769467 .0217821 -3.53 0.000
-.1196388 -.0342547
_cons .0892742 .0232513 3.84 0.000
.0437024 .1348459
sigma_u .00575965
sigma_e .00718292
rho .3913461 (fraction of variance due to
u_i)
R-sq: Obs per group:
within = 0.2941 min = 10
between = 0.0087 avg = 10.0
overall = 0.0277 max = 10
Wald chi2(5) = 42.31
corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
. estimate table ,star (0.05 0.01 0.1)
Variable active
size -.00348856***
CapitalRatio .01354658*
LoanRatio .00455987
DEP .01741126**
LLP -.07694672***
_cons .08927415***
legend: * p<.1; ** p<.05; *** p<.01
i have run panel regression.
i would like to know the interpretation of the following
coefficient star values according to the asterisks (sig 1%, 5% and 10%)
sigma_u .00575965
sigma_e .00718292
rho .3913461 (fraction of variance due to
u_i)
and R-squared within between and overall
if p-value < alpha, we reject the null hypothesis and that
variable is significant
if p-value > alpha, we fail to reject the null hypothesis
if p-value will be less than 0.01, then there would be ***
if 0.01 < p-value < 0.05, then **
0.05<p-value < 0.01, then *
more * it has, more significant it is,
if p-value < 0.01, it will automatically means p-value <
0.05 and p-value < 0.10
so if it is significant at alpha = 0.01, then it will also be
significant at alpha > 0.01 like 0.05 and 0.1
for example
p-value of size = 0.0034 < 0.01
hence it is significant at alpha = 0.01, but will also be
significant at alpha > 0.01 like 0.05 and 0.1
however if p-value < 0.10, it does not mean p-value <
0.01
for example
Dep has p-value = 0.0174
it is significant at 0.05 and 0.10,but not at 0.01
as 0.0174 < 0.05 and 0.10 but > 0.01
Hope this is useful
Please post rest parts again