Question

In: Economics

Jeff Loriss tea 2 0.5 cofee 1.5 1.5 Now consider two farmers, Jeff and Lorissa, that...

Jeff Loriss
tea 2 0.5
cofee 1.5 1.5

Now consider two farmers, Jeff and Lorissa, that can produce the above quantities of coffee OR tea.

10) What is the opportunity cost for each to produce tea? Coffee?

11) Who has a comparative advantage in producing tea? Why?

12) Suppose Jeff and Lorissa decided to trade coffee and tea with one another. Between what exchange ratios of coffee for tea (how many tons of coffee per ton of tea) would they both benefit from trade? Between what exchange ratios of tea for coffee (how many tons of tea per ton of coffee) would they both benefit from trade?

13) Which of the following is correct about comparative advantage?

a. A country has the comparative advantage in a good if it can produce more of the good than another country.

b. A country has the comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce the good at a lower opportunity cost than another country.

c. Some countries will have a comparative advantage in everything.

d. If a country has a comparative advantage it will always be a wealthy country.

14) The bowed out shape of the production possibility frontier implies that as production of one good

a. decreases, society must give up increasing amounts of another good.

b. decreases, society must give up constant amounts of another good.

c. increases, society must give up decreasing amounts of another good.

d. increases, society must give up increasing amounts of another good.

Solutions

Expert Solution

10) For Jeff

Opportunity cost of 1 unit tea = 1.5/2 =0.75

Opportunity cost of 1 unit coffee = 2/1.5 =1.33

For Loriss

Opportunity cost of 1 unit tea = 1.5/0.5 = 3

Opportunity cost of 1 unit coffee = 0.5/1.5 = 0.33

11. To determine the comparative advantages we compare the opportunity cost for Jeff and Loriss. when we compare the opportunity cost of one unit tea for Jeff and Loriss, we see that the opportunity cost for tea is lower in Jerry. therefore Jerry enjoys a comparative advantage in production of tea.

12. If each of them specializes in what they enjoy a comparative advantage and import the other good, they will be better off.

Jerry enjoys a comparative advantage in tea and produce tea. recall the opportunity cost of 1 unit of tea in Loriss is equal to 3 units of coffee. Therefore, Loriss would be open to accepting a trade of 1 unit of tea for upto 3 unit of coffee.

Loriss enjoys a comparative advantage in coffee and produce coffee. Recall the opportunity cost of 1 unit of coffee in Loriss is equal to 1.33 units of tea. Therefore, Loriss would be open to accepting a trade of 1 unit of coffee for upto 1.33 unit of tea.

13.    A country has a comparative advantage in production of a good if it can produce the good at a lower opportunity cost than another country.

Therefore the answer is b.

14. The bowed out shape of the production possibility frontier implies that as production of one good increases, society must give up increasing amounts of another good.

Therefore, the answer is d.


Related Solutions

Fit y= Ax2 to the following data: (0.5, 0.7), (1, 3.4), (1.5, 7.2), (2, 12.4), (2.5,...
Fit y= Ax2 to the following data: (0.5, 0.7), (1, 3.4), (1.5, 7.2), (2, 12.4), (2.5, 20.1)
Suppose rRF = 4%, rM = 11%, and bi = 1.5. 2. Now suppose rRF decreases...
Suppose rRF = 4%, rM = 11%, and bi = 1.5. 2. Now suppose rRF decreases to 3%. The slope of the SML remains constant. How would this affect rM and ri? -Select-IIIIIIIVV What is ri, the required rate of return on Stock i? Round your answer to one decimal place. % 1. Now suppose rRF increases to 5%. The slope of the SML remains constant. How would this affect rM and ri? rM will remain the same and ri...
Suppose rRF = 6%, rM = 11%, and bi = 1.5. 2. Now suppose rRF decreases...
Suppose rRF = 6%, rM = 11%, and bi = 1.5. 2. Now suppose rRF decreases to 5%. The slope of the SML remains constant. How would this affect rM and ri? -Select-IIIIIIIVVItem 3 What is ri, the required rate of return on Stock i? Round your answer to two decimal places. % 1. Now suppose rRF increases to 7%. The slope of the SML remains constant. How would this affect rM and ri? Both rM and ri will increase...
Consider the following Markov chain: 0 1 2 3 0 0.3 0.5 0 0.2 1 0.5...
Consider the following Markov chain: 0 1 2 3 0 0.3 0.5 0 0.2 1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 What is the probability that the first passage time from 2 to 1 is 3? What is the expected first passage time from 2 to 1? What is the expected first passage time from 2 to 2 (recurrence time for 2)? What is the relation between this expectation and the steady-state...
Consider the following problem. max ? 0.5?1 + 2.5?2 + ?3 subject to ?1 + 2?2...
Consider the following problem. max ? 0.5?1 + 2.5?2 + ?3 subject to ?1 + 2?2 + 3?3 ≤ 8 ?1, ?2, ?3 ∈ ℤ + ∪ {0} Solve the problem by dynamic programming. Show each step clearly.
At a pH of 10.4, the protein VATSIN has a charge of: 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5,...
At a pH of 10.4, the protein VATSIN has a charge of: 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5, or -2? Please explain answer and how to find the net charge of an amino acid sequence.
At a pH of 10.4, the protein VATSIN has a charge of: 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5,...
At a pH of 10.4, the protein VATSIN has a charge of: 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5, or -2? Please explain answer and how to find the net charge of an amino acid sequence.
Stock A has a beta of 1.5, but Stock B has a beta of 0.5. You...
Stock A has a beta of 1.5, but Stock B has a beta of 0.5. You expect the market to increase by 7.5 percent and you could earn 2.0 percent in a risk-free asset. What is the required return for each stock? If you invest $3,500 in Stock A and $6,500 in Stock B, what is the portfolio beta?
Question Consider the function ?(?) = ??2 and x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1. Then use...
Question Consider the function ?(?) = ??2 and x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1. Then use the suitable Newton interpolating polynomial to approximate f(0.75). Also, compute an error bound for your approximation Dont use a sheet to solve thanks numerical methods
Jeff and Sylvia Chan are now both 71 years of age and they have been retired...
Jeff and Sylvia Chan are now both 71 years of age and they have been retired for seven years. They have managed to remain debt free since their retirement seven years ago and their cash flow is now positive. Sylvia received a $1,000,000 inheritance shortly after their planned retirement and the funds were used exclusively to fund their retirement over the last six years. There is still $500,000 left from this amount and it is currently sitting in her bank...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT