Question

In: Math

To evaluate the performance of inspectors in a new company, a quality manager had a sample...

To evaluate the performance of inspectors in a new company, a quality manager had a sample of 12 novice inspectors evaluate 200 finished products. The same 200 items were evaluated by 12 experienced inspectors. SD of error for the novice inspectors was 8.64 and for the experiences inspectors was 5.74.

Was the variance in inspection errors lower for experienced inspectors than for novice inspectors? Conduct a hypothesis testing at  alpha = 0.05 and show all the work.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The provided sample variance is s^2 = 5.74 and the sample size is given by n = 12.

(1) Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

Ho: ≤ 8.64

Ha: > 8.64

This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a Chi-Square test for one population variance will be used.

(2) Rejection Region

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05.

(3) Test Statistics

The Chi-Squared statistic is computed as follows:

(4) Decision about the null hypothesis

Since it is observed that , it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

(5) Conclusion

It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population variance is greater than 8.64, at the 0.05 significance level.

the variance in inspection errors lower for experienced inspectors than for novice inspectors? Yes


Related Solutions

The Cheebles cookie factory changed their recipe. The inspectors took a sample of the new cookies...
The Cheebles cookie factory changed their recipe. The inspectors took a sample of the new cookies and found that the sample was 42 grams with a standard deviation of 4 grams. the Cheebles CEO specially asked the inspectors to use these statistics to find the lower and upper boundary weighs of 50% of their cookies. What are the Z values of the limits of the limits of the area covering the middle half of the area under the normal curve...
4. Many realistic applications involve sampling without replacement. For example, in manufacturing, quality control inspectors sample...
4. Many realistic applications involve sampling without replacement. For example, in manufacturing, quality control inspectors sample items from a finite production run without replacement. For such a finite population, we have to adjust the value of σ(X). Take (without replacement) samples of size 2 from the above population of N= 5 objects {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} (1,2) (1,3) (1,4) (1,5) (2,3), (2,4), (2,5)................ ______________________________________________________ a. How many such samples are possible? b. List all the X ’s, i.e. the...
A company attempts to evaluate the potential for a new bonus plan by selecting a sample...
A company attempts to evaluate the potential for a new bonus plan by selecting a sample of 4 salespersons to use the bonus plan for a trial period. The weekly sales volume before and after implementing the bonus plan is shown below. (For the following matched samples, let the difference "d" be d = after - before.) Weekly Sales Salesperson Before After 1 48 44 2 48 40 3 38 36 4 44 50 a. State the hypotheses. b. Compute...
A company attempts to evaluate the potential for a new bonus plan by selecting a sample...
A company attempts to evaluate the potential for a new bonus plan by selecting a sample of 4 salespersons to use the bonus plan for a trial period. The weekly sales volume before and after implementing the bonus plan is shown below. (For the following matched samples, let the difference "d" be d = after - before.) Weekly Sales Salesperson Before After 1 48 44 2 48 40 3 38 36 4 44 50 a. State the hypotheses. b. Compute...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December 31, 20x4 and 20x5: 20x4 20x5 Prevention costs:     Quality audits $66,000        $99,000            Vendor certification 121,500        182,250        Appraisal costs:     Product acceptance $90,000        $135,000            Process acceptance 87,000        102,500        Internal failure costs:     Retesting $100,000        $94,000            Rework 200,000        170,000        External failure costs:     Recalls $145,000        $116,000            Warranty 315,000        318,000        At the end of 20x4, management decided to increase its investment in control costs by 50 percent for each category’s...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December 31, 20x4 and 20x5: 20x4 20x5 Prevention costs:     Quality audits $60,000        $90,000            Vendor certification 127,500        191,250        Appraisal costs:     Product acceptance $84,000        $126,000            Process acceptance 93,000        115,000        Internal failure costs:     Retesting $98,000        $86,000            Rework 204,000        185,000        External failure costs:     Recalls $152,500        $122,000            Warranty 305,000        302,000        At the end of 20x4, management decided to increase its investment in control costs by 50 percent for each category’s...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December...
Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December 31, 20x4 and 20x5: 20x4 20x5 Prevention costs:     Quality audits $65,000        $97,500            Vendor certification 123,500        185,250        Appraisal costs:     Product acceptance $91,000        $136,500            Process acceptance 99,000        110,000        Internal failure costs:     Retesting $92,000        $96,000            Rework 204,000        173,000        External failure costs:     Recalls $140,000        $112,000            Warranty 325,000        294,000        At the end of 20x4, management decided to increase its investment in control costs by 50 percent for each category’s...
Cornerstone Exercise 14.2 (Algorithmic) Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for...
Cornerstone Exercise 14.2 (Algorithmic) Interim Quality Performance Report Davis, Inc., had the following quality costs for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015: 2014 2015 Prevention costs:     Quality audits $68,000        $102,000            Vendor certification 125,500        188,250        Appraisal costs:     Product acceptance $91,000        $136,500            Process acceptance 97,000        107,500        Internal failure costs:     Retesting $92,000        $82,000            Rework 173,000        214,000        External failure costs:     Recalls $127,500        $102,000            Warranty 315,000        318,000        At the end of 2014, management decided to increase its investment in control costs by 50...
In your new role as quality manager of high-tech unit of a large national company, you...
In your new role as quality manager of high-tech unit of a large national company, you identify a problem which is typified by the two internal memos shown below. Discuss in some detail the problems illustrated by this conflict, explaining how you would set about trying to make improvements. (You should discuss at least 2 problems) From: Marketing Director To: Managing Director C.C Production Manager Works Manager Date: 4 August We have recently carried out a customer survey to examine...
GMP Case Study Scenario You are the quality control (QC) manager for a relatively new company...
GMP Case Study Scenario You are the quality control (QC) manager for a relatively new company that conducts manufacturing operations under contract to pharmaceutical companies. Your company’s facility handles rDNA protein products made in fermentation processes, followed by downstream purification steps, as well as and all testing. The facility was inspected in 2015 to local current good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards.   The ongoing contract you have with SuperPharma P/L has entered a new phase. SuperPharma are providing a second generation...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT