Question

In: Statistics and Probability

1, A police officer randomly selected 585 police records of larceny thefts. The accompanying data represent...

1, A police officer randomly selected 585 police records of larceny thefts. The accompanying data represent the number of offenses for various types of larceny thefts.

​(a)

Construct a probability model for type of larceny theft.

​(b)

Are coin-operated machine larcenies​ unusual?

​(c)

Are bicycle larcenies ​unusual?

​(a) Complete the table below.

Type of Larceny Theft Number of Offenses
Pocket picking 9
Purse snatching 10
Shoplifting 124
From motor vehicles 222
Motor vehicle accessories 64
Bicycles 37
From buildings 108
From coin-operated machines 11

​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)

2, A baseball player hit 61 home runs in a season. Of the 61 home​ runs, 17 went to right​ field,20 went to right center field, 12 went to center​ field, 11 went to left center​ field, and 1 went to left field.

​(a)

What is the probability that a randomly selected home run was hit to right​ field?

​(b)

What is the probability that a randomly selected home run was hit to left​ field?

​(c)

Was it unusual for this player to hit a home run to left​ field? Explain.

​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

(1)

(a)

A probability model for type of larceny theft is constructed as follows:

Type of Larceny Theft (x) Probability (p)
Pocket picking 9/585 = 0.015
Purse snatching 10/585 = 0.017
Shoplifting 124/585 = 0.212
From motor vehicles 222/585 = 0.379
Motor vehicle accessories 64/585 = 0.109
Bicycles 37/585 = 0.063
From buildings 108/585 =0.185
From coin-operated machines 11/585 = 0.019

​(b)

Coin-operated machine larcenies​ are unusual because the probability of Coin-operated machine larcenies​ = 0.019 = 1.90% is less than 5%

(c)

Bicycle larcenies ​are not unusual because the probability of Bicycle larcenies ​= 0.063 = 6.30 % is greater than 5%.

(2)

(a)

the probability that a randomly selected home run was hit to right​ field = 17/61 = 0.279

(b)

the probability that a randomly selected home run was hit to left​ field = 1/61 = 0.016

(c)

it was unusual for this player to hit a home run to left​ field because the probability that a randomly selected home run was hit to left​ field = 1/61 = 0.016 = 1.60 % less than 5%


Related Solutions

The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEO) and...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEO) and the​ company's stock performance in a recent year. Complete parts​ (a) through​ (d) below. LOADING... Click the icon to view the CEO data. ​(a) One would think that a higher stock return would lead to a higher compensation. Based on​ this, what would likely be the explanatory​ variable? Stock return Compensation ​(b) Draw a scatter diagram of the data. Use the result from part​...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEOs) and...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEOs) and the​ company's stock performance. Company   Compensation   Return A   14.98   74.48 B   4.61   63.62 C   6.15   148.21 D   1.11   30.35 E   1.54   11.94 F   3.28   29.09 G   11.06   0.64 H   7.77   64.16 I   8.23   50.41 J   4.47   53.19 K   21.39   21.94 L   5.23   33.68 ​(a) Treating compensation as the explanatory​ variable, x, use technology to determine the estimates of β0 and β1. The estimate of...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEOs) and...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEOs) and the​ company's stock performance. Company   Compensation   Return A   14.98   74.48 B   4.61   63.62 C   6.15   148.21 D   1.11   30.35 E   1.54   11.94 F   3.28   29.09 G   11.06   0.64 H   7.77   64.16 I   8.23   50.41 J   4.47   53.19 K   21.39   21.94 L   5.23   33.68 ​(a) Treating compensation as the explanatory​ variable, x, use technology to determine the estimates of β0 and β1. The estimate of...
partial credit, 14.1.19-T The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive...
partial credit, 14.1.19-T The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEOs) and the​ company's stock performance. Use the data to complete parts​ (a) through​ (d). LOADING... Click the icon to view the data table. ​(a) Treating compensation as the explanatory​ variable, x, use technology to determine the estimates of beta 0 and beta 1. The estimate of beta 1 is nothing. ​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.) Enter your answer in the...
1. CoastCo Insurance is interested in developing a forecast of larceny thefts in the United States....
1. CoastCo Insurance is interested in developing a forecast of larceny thefts in the United States. Year Larcency Thefts* 1 8,151 2 8,348 3 9,263 4 9,978 5 10,271 6 9,906 7 9,983 8 10,578 9 11,137 10 11,194 11 11,143 12 10,713 13 10,592 14 10,926 15 11,257 16 11,500 17 11,706 18 11,872 Plot this series in a time series plot and make a naive forecast for years 2 through 19. Plot actual and forecast values of the...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers (CEO) and the company's stock performance in a recent year.
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12 randomly selected chief executive officers (CEO) and the company's stock performance in a recent year. Complete parts (a) through (d) below.(a) One would think that a higher stock return would lead to a higher compensation. Based on this, what would likely be the explanatory variable?  Stock return Compensation (b) Draw a scatter diagram of the data. Use the result from part (a) to determine the explanatory variable. Choose the correct graph below.(c) Determine the...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEO) and the​...
The accompanying data represent the total compensation for 12randomly selected chief executive officers​ (CEO) and the​ company's stock performance in a recent year. Complete parts​ (a)through​ (d) below. Company Compensation​ ($mil) Stock Return​ (%) Company A 14.51    75.47 Company B 4.09 63.96 Company C 7.06 142.07 Company D 1.01 32.66 Company E 1.96 10.63 Company F 3.77 30.69 Company G 12.03 0.71 Company H 7.63 69.35 Company I 8.47 58.74 Company J 4.07 55.97 Company K 20.91 24.27 Company L...
Consider the accompanying data examining the heights and arm spans of randomly selected students. Complete parts...
Consider the accompanying data examining the heights and arm spans of randomly selected students. Complete parts a through g below. Height_(cm) Arm_Span_(cm) 179 170 169 179 150 153 175 170 178 153 200 188 161 147 160 151 175 157 173 199 Rsquared=32.6% s=2.56 constant=39.215 height 0.741 a) Write the regression equation. Define the variables used in your equation. Arm Span (cm)=_____+_____•( Height(cm)) b) f a student is 165 cm​ tall, what is his predicted Arm​ Span? c)f this 165...
The given data represent the total compensation for 10 randomly selected CEOs and their​ company's stock...
The given data represent the total compensation for 10 randomly selected CEOs and their​ company's stock performance in 2009. Analysis of this data reveals a correlation coefficient of r=-0.2000. What would be the predicted stock return for a company whose CEO made​ $15 million? What would be the predicted stock return for a company whose CEO made​ $25 million? Compensation ($ millions)   Stock Return (%) 26.81 6.16 12.66 29.92 19.14 31.49 13.11 79.34 11.99 -8.35 11.41 2.22 26.23 4.08 14.61...
The given data represent the total compensation for 10 randomly selected CEOs and their​ company's stock...
The given data represent the total compensation for 10 randomly selected CEOs and their​ company's stock performance in 2009. Analysis of this data reveals a correlation coefficient of requals=negative 0.2324−0.2324. Compensation ​(millions of​ dollars) Stock Return​ (%) 26.8126.81 6.286.28 12.6112.61 30.3330.33 19.0219.02 31.6831.68 12.8712.87 79.2779.27 12.5212.52 negative 8.17−8.17 11.8311.83 2.272.27 25.9925.99 4.594.59 14.8214.82 10.5810.58 17.2817.28 3.653.65 14.3414.34 11.96 What would be the predicted stock return for a company whose CEO made​ $15 million? What would be the predicted stock return...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT