Question

Even though the trait approach to leadership has no empirical support, it is still widely used. In your opin- ion, why is this so? In what ways is the use of the trait approach helpful to those who use it? In what ways is it harmful to those who use it?

Answer 1

Trait theory or approach to leadership is widely supported and used because researchers have highlighted and summarised the common traits among great leaders all across the history. The people who know these traits think that people who show hints of these traits are inherently good leaders. Proven good leaders and entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg etc are oftentimes also referred to as good leaders with reference to their traits.

The trait approach is good for people because oftentimes people can fake traits to portray an image of being a good or exceptional leader. Similarly people who show certain traits of being a good leader gain acceptance from their subordinates and are given an edge over others.

But the trait theory is not motivating for people who have the ability to learn new traits. With the trait approach to leadership, the people with the will to learn to become good leaders are totally discouraged and disregarded. The trait approach clearly states that leaders are born and not made. With the trait theory in mind, mentoring new talent becomes useless and companies need to wait for people with leadership traits to manage the company rather than promoting employees based on their experience and learning. The trait approach disregards experience of people and their learning before they become leaders.