In: Finance
250 words
Why does traditional NPV analysis tend to underestimate the true value of a capital budgeting project?
Net Present Value is the present value of future cash flows due
to the project in excess of the initial investment. If NPV is
greater than 0 the project is accepted for independent projects.
For mutually exclusive projects higher NPV project is chosen.
However NPV underestimates the true value of the project because of
following reasons:
1. NPV assumes that the cash inflows or outflows are reinvested at
WACC which might underestimate the project. However the cash can be
reinvested at higher rate compared to WACC which can give a higher
NPV which might make the project suitable over others.
2. NPV is calculated at target debt equity ratio. However, when
target debt equity ratio changes then WACC keeps on changing and
this makes calculation of NPV is difficult. Moreover, if in future
WACC reduces then NPV will be underestimated for fixed WACC issued
for calculation.
3. NPV fails to calculate increase in value in case a project is
stopped and is reinvested to a higher NPV project. It does not help
in deciding whether to continue or discontinue a project in case it
is started.
4. It excludes the idea of real options. Some projects might not be
profitable for certain period but when executed can generate huge
cash flows in future as it might allow to start a new project. Such
projects cannot be calculated or value using NPV. NPV of research
and development can’t be calculated using NPV because future cash
flow can’t be estimated for such project. But the actual value of
such projects might be very high.
Best of Luck. God Bless