In: Finance
1. The Sturgeon Corp. has developed a new line of spinning reel it plans to produce and sell in the United States. The cost of the necessary equipment will be $2.8 million plus $340,000 for installation and delivery. The equipment falls into the MACRS 7-year class. The equipment will be scrapped when the project is finished in 5 years for an estimated $700,000. Sturgeon estimates that sales in the first year of production will be 110,000 units at $30 apiece. Due to intense marketing and word-of-mouth advertising, they believe sales will increase by 50% in the second year. Sales are estimated to grow at 10% in the third year. Sales in year 4 and 5 will be the same as in year 3. Variable production costs will be 65% of sales. Fixed costs will be $250,000 in year 1, and will increase at 4% per year. The sales price of the spinning reel is estimated to increase at 4% per year over the life of the project also. Net operating working capital requirements will be 6% of sales. If Sturgeon is in the 40% tax bracket, what will be the cash flows for each year of this project (don’t forget time 0 and the extra terminal year cash flows) Also calculate the NPV assuming Sturgeon has a 12% cost of capital. Should Sturgeon Accept the project?
2. Explain the major differences between cash flows for replacement (cost cutting) projects versus cash flows for expansion projects.
3. What are substitutionary and complementary effects in the context of capital budgeting cash flow analysis? Give an example of each.
4. What are opportunity costs in cash flow analysis?
NPV Calculations | Year 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Initial cost+Installation | -3140000 | |||||
NWC introduced in the yr. | -198000 | -99000 | -29700 | 0 | 0 | |
NWC recovered | 326700 | |||||
After-tax salvage | 700214 | |||||
CAPEX & NWC cash flows----1 | -3140000 | -198000 | -99000 | -29700 | 0 | 1026914 |
Operating Cash Flows: | ||||||
Total sale value | 3300000 | 4950000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | |
Less: Variable prodn. Costs(65%*Sales) | 2145000 | 3217500 | 3539250 | 3539250 | 3539250 | |
Less: Fixed costs | 250000 | 260000 | 270400 | 281216 | 292465 | |
Less: Depreciation | 448706 | 768986 | 549186 | 392186 | 280402 | |
EBT | 456294 | 703514 | 1086164 | 1232348 | 1332883 | |
Less: Tax at 40% | 182518 | 281406 | 434466 | 492939 | 533153 | |
EAT | 273776 | 422108 | 651698 | 739409 | 799730 | |
Add Back: Depn. | 448706 | 768986 | 549186 | 392186 | 280402 | |
Annual Operating cash flow---2 | 722482 | 1191094 | 1200884 | 1131595 | 1080132 | |
Total annual cash flows(1+2) | -3140000 | 524482.4 | 1092094 | 1171184 | 1131595 | 2107046 |
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.89286 | 0.79719 | 0.71178 | 0.63552 | 0.56743 |
PV at 12% | -3140000 | 468288 | 870611 | 833626 | 719149 | 1195594 |
NPV | 947268 | |||||
As the project's NPV is POSITIVE,Sturgeon should ACCEPT the same. | ||||||
WORKINGS: | ||||||
Sales in units | 110000 | 165000 | 181500 | 181500 | 181500 | |
Selling price/unit | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
Total sale value | 3300000 | 4950000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | |
NWC reqd. at 6%*sales | 198000 | 297000 | 326700 | 326700 | 326700 | |
NWC introduced in the yr. | 198000 | 99000 | 29700 | 0 | 0 | |
After-tax salvage | MACRS Rates | |||||
Initial cost | 3140000 | 14.29 | ||||
Less:Acc. Depn. Upto yr.5(77.69%*3140000) | 2439466 | 24.49 | ||||
Carrying/Book value | 700534 | 17.49 | ||||
Less:Salvage | 700000 | 12.49 | ||||
Loss on salvage | 534 | 8.93 | ||||
Tax saved on loss(534*40%) | 214 | 8.92 | ||||
So, cash inflow on salvage(700000+214) | 700214 | 8.93 | ||||
4.46 | ||||||
100 |
NPV Calculations | Year 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Initial cost+Installation | -3140000 | |||||
NWC introduced in the yr. | -198000 | -99000 | -29700 | 0 | 0 | |
NWC recovered | 326700 | |||||
After-tax salvage | 700214 | |||||
CAPEX & NWC cash flows----1 | -3140000 | -198000 | -99000 | -29700 | 0 | 1026914 |
Operating Cash Flows: | ||||||
Total sale value | 3300000 | 4950000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | |
Less: Variable prodn. Costs(65%*Sales) | 2145000 | 3217500 | 3539250 | 3539250 | 3539250 | |
Less: Fixed costs | 250000 | 260000 | 270400 | 281216 | 292465 | |
Less: Depreciation | 448706 | 768986 | 549186 | 392186 | 280402 | |
EBT | 456294 | 703514 | 1086164 | 1232348 | 1332883 | |
Less: Tax at 40% | 182518 | 281406 | 434466 | 492939 | 533153 | |
EAT | 273776 | 422108 | 651698 | 739409 | 799730 | |
Add Back: Depn. | 448706 | 768986 | 549186 | 392186 | 280402 | |
Annual Operating cash flow---2 | 722482 | 1191094 | 1200884 | 1131595 | 1080132 | |
Total annual cash flows(1+2) | -3140000 | 524482.4 | 1092094 | 1171184 | 1131595 | 2107046 |
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.89286 | 0.79719 | 0.71178 | 0.63552 | 0.56743 |
PV at 12% | -3140000 | 468288 | 870611 | 833626 | 719149 | 1195594 |
NPV | 947268 | |||||
As the project's NPV is POSITIVE,Sturgeon should ACCEPT the same. | ||||||
WORKINGS: | ||||||
Sales in units | 110000 | 165000 | 181500 | 181500 | 181500 | |
Selling price/unit | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
Total sale value | 3300000 | 4950000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | 5445000 | |
NWC reqd. at 6%*sales | 198000 | 297000 | 326700 | 326700 | 326700 | |
NWC introduced in the yr. | 198000 | 99000 | 29700 | 0 | 0 | |
After-tax salvage | MACRS Rates | |||||
Initial cost | 3140000 | 14.29 | ||||
Less:Acc. Depn. Upto yr.5(77.69%*3140000) | 2439466 | 24.49 | ||||
Carrying/Book value | 700534 | 17.49 | ||||
Less:Salvage | 700000 | 12.49 | ||||
Loss on salvage | 534 | 8.93 | ||||
Tax saved on loss(534*40%) | 214 | 8.92 | ||||
So, cash inflow on salvage(700000+214) | 700214 | 8.93 | ||||
4.46 | ||||||
100 |
2.Cash flows for replacement (cost cutting) projects |
Replacement projects are mostly ubdertaken to reduce the current cost-levels |
so,it reduces the cash outflow --thus resulting in increased cash flow within the business |
for example, improvised new machines help to reduce labor costs as well as wastages in production. |
Whereas, |
cash flows in expansion projects |
are new & additional cash outflows or expenses equally matched by cash inflows or incomes. |
4.Opportunity costs in cash flow analysis |
Opportunity costs are income sacrificed or foregone, by choosing to undertake a different project , in the place of an already available one. |
As for example, the rental income possible in a building is sacrificed , when the same building is utilised in a different & new project. |
The rent income foregone is the opportunity cost for the new project-ie. Cost of positive opportunity lost. |
3. Substitutionary and complementary effects in the context of capital budgeting cash flow analysis with an example of each. |
Substitutionary effect of a new project is also called cannibalisation effect , where by, the existing income is reduced directly due to the undertaking of the new project. |
ie. Sale of an older version of an equipment getting reduced due to introduction of a new model. |
Complementary effect is achieved when the existing income is accelerated or facilitated due to the introduction of a new project/product. |
As for example, the sale of accessories for a particular model of car picks up as more & more that model cars are sold. |