Question

In: Finance

Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Mallette Manufacturing, Inc.,...

Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment

Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for $6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years.

The existing system is capable of producing 100,000 dishwashers per year. Sales and production data using the existing system are provided by the Accounting Department:

Sales per year (units) 100,000
Selling price $300
Costs per unit:
   Direct materials 80
   Direct labor 90
   Volume-related overhead 20
Direct fixed overhead 40*

*All cash expenses with the exception of depreciation, which is $6 per unit. The existing equipment is being depreciated using straight-line with no salvage value considered.

The automated system will cost $34 million to purchase, plus an estimated $20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for $3 million.

The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by $4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by $17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention.

The firm’s cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent.

The present value tables provided in Exhibit 19B.1 and Exhibit 19B.2 must be used to solve the following problems.

Required:

1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system.

Old system $
New system $

Which system would the company choose?
Old system

2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate.

Old system $
New system $

3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: “Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year.” Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate.

Old system $

4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for $4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate.

New system Increases to NPV = $
Old system Unchanged to NPV = $

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)
Old system
Year Sales revenue = 100,000 x $300 Less : Cost = 100,000 x (80+90+20+40 - 6) EBIT Tax Net Income Add: Depreciation = $100000 x $6 Net Operating Cash Flow PV @ 20% Present Value
0 1 0
1 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.8333 $4,000,000.00
2 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.6944 $3,333,333.33
3 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.5787 $2,777,777.78
4 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.4823 $2,314,814.81
5 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.4019 $1,929,012.35
6 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.3349 $1,607,510.29
7 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.2791 $1,339,591.91
8 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.2326 $1,116,326.59
9 $30,000,000.00 $23,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $4,200,000.00 $600,000.00 $4,800,000.00 0.1938 $930,272.16
10 $30,000,000.00 $22,400,000.00 $7,600,000.00 $3,040,000.00 $4,560,000.00 $0.00 $4,560,000.00 0.1615 $736,465.46
NPV $20,085,104.67
New System
Year Sales revenue = 100,000 x $300 Less : Cost = 100,000 x $135 Depreciation = $54000000/10 EBIT Tax Net Income Add: Depreciation = $100000 x $6 Net Operating Cash Flow PV @ 20% Present Value
0 -$50,040,000.00 1 -$50,040,000.00
1 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.8333 $10,350,000.00
2 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.6944 $8,625,000.00
3 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.5787 $7,187,500.00
4 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.4823 $5,989,583.33
5 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.4019 $4,991,319.44
6 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.3349 $4,159,432.87
7 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.2791 $3,466,194.06
8 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.2326 $2,888,495.05
9 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.1938 $2,407,079.21
10 $30,000,000.00 $12,900,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $11,700,000.00 $4,680,000.00 $7,020,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $12,420,000.00 0.1615 $2,005,899.34
NPV $2,030,503.30
Costs per unit:
Direct materials = $80 x (1-25%) 60
Direct labor = $90 x (1-60%) 36
Costs per unit:
Direct materials = $80 x (1-25%) 60
Direct labor = $90 x (1-60%) 36
Volume-related overhead ($20 -4) 16
Direct fixed overhead= 40- 17-6 17
Total cost per unit 129
Net outlay = $54,000,000 – $3,000,000 - $960,000 $50,040,000.00
Year 0: Tax savings on loss from sale of old machine = 0.4×($6,000,000 – $600,000 – $3,000,000) = $960,000.00
Old system $20,085,104.67
New system $2,030,503.30
The company should keep the old system

Related Solutions

Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows: Year Traditional Equipment Contemporary Technology    0 $(1,000,000) $(4,000,000)    1...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows: Year Traditional Equipment Contemporary Technology    0 $(1,000,000) $(4,000,000)    1...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows: Year Traditional Equipment Contemporary Technology    0 $(993,550) $(3,999,850)    1...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows: Year Traditional Equipment Contemporary Technology    0 $(990,100) $(4,002,950)    1...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment...
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows: Year Traditional Equipment Contemporary Technology 0 $(1,000,800) $(4,006,700) 1...
1.) What are some examples of potential intangible benefits of investment proposals? Why do these intangible...
1.) What are some examples of potential intangible benefits of investment proposals? Why do these intangible benefits complicate the capital budgeting evaluation process? What might happen if intangible benefits are ignored in a capital budgeting decision? 2.) What are some examples of nonfinancial measures used by companies to evaluate performance?
Analyze the pros and cons of identifying the potential intangible benefits of investment proposals. What is...
Analyze the pros and cons of identifying the potential intangible benefits of investment proposals. What is the outcome if management fails to consider the intangible benefits in a capital budgeting decision?
Horizon Co is a manufacturing company that wishes to evaluate an investment in new production machinery....
Horizon Co is a manufacturing company that wishes to evaluate an investment in new production machinery. The machinery would enable the company to satisfy increasing demand for existing products and the investment is not expected to lead to any change in the existing level of business risk of Horizon Co. The machinery will cost Rs.2·5 million, payable at the start of the first year of operation, and is not expected to have any scrap value. Annual before-tax net cash flows...
Define and explain the following in economic terms: 1)Discount rates (rates of time preference) and their...
Define and explain the following in economic terms: 1)Discount rates (rates of time preference) and their role in promoting collusion in oligopoly 2)Prisoner’s Dilemma
Harold Blank, Vice President of Manufacturing for Herr Foods, Inc., was contemplating a capital investment that...
Harold Blank, Vice President of Manufacturing for Herr Foods, Inc., was contemplating a capital investment that could improve production; however, this operations decision would force several of his recently hired employees into new jobs as positions were eliminated by automation. Herr Foods took pride in achieving the highest quality in their finished products. Their top product line was potato chips, and the final physical inspection was a critical step. That was when several employees identified and removed around 75% of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT