Question

1. Discuss the relationship between the Enlightenment and the Scientific Revolution. Could one have occurred without the other?

Answer 1

The Scientific Revolution occurred sooner than the Enlightenment.
The Scientific Revolution brought about science turning into an unmistakable order separate from theory or religious philosophy. This revolution was portrayed by various advances in the fields of material science, arithmetic, cosmology, and science. It likewise sabotaged the impact of the Catholic Church. Galileo, Copernicus, and Isaac Newton were driving figures of the Scientific Revolution.
The Enlightenment, on the other hand, stretched out past the field of science and was an a lot more extensive scholarly development. It kept going from the late seventeenth to the mid nineteenth century and accentuated subjects like explanation, independence, and wariness. In numerous regards the Enlightenment was against administrative. Deism was a significant result of the Enlightenment. Deism is the conviction that God permits the universe to work as per normal law, with no powerful obstruction.
The scientific revolution established the frameworks for the Age of Enlightenment, which fixated on reason as the essential wellspring of power and authenticity, and accentuated the significance of the scientific technique. By the eighteenth century, when the Enlightenment thrived, scientific authority started to uproot strict power, and trains up to that point seen as really scientific (e.g., speculative chemistry and crystal gazing) lost scientific validity.
Science came to play a main role in Enlightenment discourse and thought. Numerous Enlightenment thinkers and masterminds had foundations in the sciences, and related scientific progression with the topple of religion and conventional expert for the advancement of free discourse and thought. Comprehensively, Enlightenment science incredibly esteemed induction and normal idea, and was inserted with the Enlightenment perfect of headway and progress. At that point, science was overwhelmed by scientific social orders and institutes, which had to a great extent supplanted colleges as focuses of scientific innovative work. Social orders and foundations were likewise the foundation of the development of the scientific calling. Another significant advancement was the promotion of science among an undeniably educated populace. The century saw huge progressions in the act of medication, science, and material science; the advancement of organic scientific categorization; another comprehension of attraction and power; and the development of science as a control, which set up the foundations of present day science.

Thanks;)...