Question

In: Operations Management

In December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to...

In December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to address climate change, which many observers called a breakthrough for several reasons. First, the fact that a deal was struck at all was a major accomplishment, given the failure of previous climate change talks. Second, unlike previous climate change accords that focused exclusively on developed countries, this pact committed both developed and developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the voluntary targets established by nations in the Paris climate deal fall considerably short of what many scientists deem necessary to achieve the stated goal of the negotiations: limiting the global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius. Furthermore, since the established targets are voluntary, they may be lowered or abandoned due to political resistance, short-term economic crises, or simply social fatigue or disinterest.

As philosophy professor Stephen Gardiner aptly explains, the challenge of climate change presents the world with several fundamental ethical dilemmas. It is simultaneously a profoundly global, intergenerational, and philosophical problem. First, from a global perspective, climate change presents the world with a collective action problem: all countries have a collective interest in controlling global carbon emissions. But each individual country also has incentives to over-consume (in this case, to emit as much carbon as necessary) in response to societal demands for economic growth and prosperity.

Second, as an intergenerational problem, the consequences of actions taken by the current generation will have the greatest impact on future generations yet to be born. Thus, the current generation must forego benefits today in order to protect against possibly catastrophic costs in the future. This tradeoff is particularly difficult for developing countries. They must somehow achieve economic growth in the present to break out of a persistent cycle of poverty, while limiting the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted into the atmosphere to protect future generations. The fact that prosperous, developed countries (such as the U.S. and those in Europe) arguably created the current climate problems during their previous industrial economic development in the 19th and 20th centuries complicates the tradeoffs between economic development and preventing further climate change.

Finally, the global and intergenerational nature of climate change points to the underlying philosophical dimensions of the problem. While it is intuitive that the current generation has some ethical responsibility to leave an inhabitable world to future generations, the extent of this obligation is less clear. The same goes for individual countries who have pledged to reduce carbon emissions to help protect environmental health, but then face real economic and social costs when executing those pledges. Developing nations faced with these costs may encounter further challenges as the impact of climate change will most likely fall disproportionally on the poor, thus also raising issues of fairness and inequality.

6. Considering that the negative impacts of climate change will likely fall disproportionally on the poor, yet developing countries must often increase consumption and emissions to achieve greater economic growth, do you think developing nations should be exempt from actions to control climate change? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

6. Considering that the negative impacts of climate change will likely fall disproportionally on the poor, yet developing countries must often increase consumption and emissions to achieve greater economic growth, do you think developing nations should be exempt from actions to control climate change? Why or why not?

I think that no one should be exempt from actions to control climate change because its everyone responsibility to make this world a better place. A developing nations of ten increase consumption and emissions to achieve their greater economic growth. At same time they can plant trees or use more environment friendly procedures to help with cutting the emission down. I believe that they shouldn't be exempt but held to a lower standard (For now). They may be increasing consumption and emissions right now but go back 50, 100, 200 years you'll see the big "developed countries" doing the same thing.


Related Solutions

In December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to...
In December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to address climate change, which many observers called a breakthrough for several reasons. First, the fact that a deal was struck at all was a major accomplishment, given the failure of previous climate change talks. Second, unlike previous climate change accords that focused exclusively on developed countries, this pact committed both developed and developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the voluntary targets established...
n December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to...
n December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to address climate change, which many observers called a breakthrough for several reasons. First, the fact that a deal was struck at all was a major accomplishment, given the failure of previous climate change talks. Second, unlike previous climate change accords that focused exclusively on developed countries, this pact committed both developed and developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the voluntary targets established...
   On June 10, 2015, representatives from 26 African nations signed an agreement pledging to work...
   On June 10, 2015, representatives from 26 African nations signed an agreement pledging to work together to establish a free trade area that would remove or reduce many tariffs and eliminate time-consuming customs procedures between them. Known as the Tripartite Free Trade Area (TFTA), this common market encompass more than 630 million people an link together three existing regional trading blocks in Southern and eastern Africa with a combined gross domestic product of $1.2 trillion and over $102 billion...
Q: The Paris Climate Conference (COP21) in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first ever universal,...
Q: The Paris Climate Conference (COP21) in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first ever universal, legally binding global climate deal. The agreement sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius. COP21 limits the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by human activity to the same levels that trees, soil and oceans can absorb naturally, beginning at some point between 2050 and...
In the year 2015, leaders from 193 countries of the world gathered and moderated by the...
In the year 2015, leaders from 193 countries of the world gathered and moderated by the United Nation and finally summarized that there are 17 goals for the world to be achieved in 2030 named as UNDP Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) towards 2030. Explains 5 (five) of the goals with the examples that important to be in line with engineering profession which you can contribute in your career after graduation. THIS IS THE LINK FOR 17 GOAL. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf
In the year 2015, leaders from 193 countries of the world gathered and moderated by the...
In the year 2015, leaders from 193 countries of the world gathered and moderated by the United Nation and finally summarized that there are 17 goals for the world to be achieved in 2030 named as UNDP Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) towards 2030. Explains 5 (five) of the goals with the examples that important to be in line with engineering profession which you can contribute in your career after graduation. THIS IS THE LINK FOR 17 GOAL. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf
Blue Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December...
Blue Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December 31, 2020. Annual rental payments of $51,025are to be made at the beginning of each lease year (December 31). The interest rate used by the lessor in setting the payment schedule is 6%; Blue’s incremental borrowing rate is 8%. Blue is unaware of the rate being used by the lessor. At the end of the lease, Blue has the option to buy the equipment...
Tamarisk Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December...
Tamarisk Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December 31, 2020. Annual rental payments of $61,020 are to be made at the beginning of each lease year (December 31). The interest rate used by the lessor in setting the payment schedule is 7%; Tamarisk’s incremental borrowing rate is 9%. Tamarisk is unaware of the rate being used by the lessor. At the end of the lease, Tamarisk has the option to buy the...
Marin Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December...
Marin Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December 31, 2020. Annual rental payments of $46,000 are to be made at the beginning of each lease year (December 31). The interest rate used by the lessor in setting the payment schedule is 7%; Marin’s incremental borrowing rate is 9%. Marin is unaware of the rate being used by the lessor. At the end of the lease, Marin has the option to buy the...
Pronghorn Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December...
Pronghorn Steel Company, as lessee, signed a lease agreement for equipment for 5 years, beginning December 31, 2020. Annual rental payments of $43,000 are to be made at the beginning of each lease year (December 31). The interest rate used by the lessor in setting the payment schedule is 7%; Pronghorn’s incremental borrowing rate is 9%. Pronghorn is unaware of the rate being used by the lessor. At the end of the lease, Pronghorn has the option to buy the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT