In: Computer Science
Population 1 (1):
Population 2 (1):
Create a graphical representation of your two distributions (Please include both distributions on the same graph and label the means on your x axis) (2):
Null hypothesis (in symbol format) (1):
Research hypothesis (in symbol format) (1):
Independent Variable (1):
Dependent Variable (1):
What is your probability of making a Type I Error? (1)
What is the difference between a Type I and Type II Error? (2)
n (number of people in your sample): (1)
(standard error of the mean): (2)
0.78/square root 30= 0.14
Computed Z score: (3)
p value (round to 3 decimal places) (1):
Interpret your result. (5)
Indicate the raw score(s) for a 95% confidence interval around your sample’s M. (2)
2.8-2(0.78) and 2.8+2(0.78) = (1.24, 4.36)
Indicate the raw score(s) for a 99% confidence interval around your sample’s M. (2)
2.8-3(0.78) and 2.8+3(0.78) = (0.46, 5.14)
Compute your Effect Size (using Cohen’s d): (3)
What is the magnitude of your effect size (i.e., large, medium, small, etc.) (1)
Answer:----
Probability of making a Type I Error is
Type 1 error is alpha = 0.05. That is 5% or a probability of 5 in 100
The difference between a Type I and Type II Error
1. Type 1 errors also called as FALSE POSITIVES are defined as "rejecting a true null
2. hypotheses by calling it false"
3. Type 2 errors also called as FALSE NEGATIVES are defined as "accepting a false
4. null hypotheses by saying it is true".
5. Therefore, a Type 1 error is more serious than a Type 2 error. But in common language,
6. So, the Type 1 errors occur when we reject something (a genuine product, a suitable candidate, a great date) that should have been accepted.
7. While a Type 2 error is accepting something that should have been rejected (a defective product, a fake candidate, a bad date).
Note that in statistics by definition, a 'null' hypotheses always is phrased as 'there is no difference', 'there is no relation', 'there is no impact' and so on.
Standard error of the mean:
Given,
σ =.0.76
square root 30
the mean =
=0.76/ = 0.1387
Computed Z score :
z = (2.8 -5)/0.1387 = -15.86.
A z score of over -3 indicates that the sample is highly unusual.
p value (round to 3 decimal places ):
the p-value cannot be calculated for the computed z score.
the raw score(s) for a 95% confidence interval around your sample’s M & the raw score(s) for a 99% confidence interval around your sample’s M
The raw score is given by the formula: raw score = mean + (z score)(standard deviation)
At 95% confidence interval, the raw score = 2.8 =/- 1.96(0.78)
Lower boundary = 1.2712 & Upper boundary = 4.3288
At 99% confidence interval, the raw score = 2.8 =/- 2.58(0.78)
Lower boundary = 0.7876 & Upper boundary = 4.8124
.Effect Size (using Cohen’s d):
M1:5
M2:2.8
SD1:0.76
SD2:0.78
Then,
Cohen's d =M1-M2/root(((SD1)2+( SD2)2/2)
= (5-2.8)/root(((0.76)2+(0.78)2/2)
= 2.85
The magnitude of your effect size (i.e., large, medium, small, etc.) :
As Cohen's d is >2, we can say that the effect size is 'Huge'.