Question

In: Economics

TAX CUT OF 1964 Was there a production gap when Kennedy assumed the presidency in January...

TAX CUT OF 1964

Was there a production gap when Kennedy assumed the presidency in January 1961? How large was it? Assume a GNP growth rate of 3.3% (approximately the U.S. long-run average real GDP growth rate) starting in 1955 and project forward using a Google Docs spreadsheet or Excel document.

What were the critical economic issues (and assumptions) of the tax cut debate?   

Was the Tax Cut of 1964 a supply-side or demand-side tax cut?

How successful was the Tax Cut of 1964? What general lessons do your conclusions suggest regarding use of fiscal policy as a macroeconomic management tool?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Production Gap is an economic term which shows us the deviation of actual industrial production in a country from the expected potential production . It occurs when there is under utilization of resources in the economy . Yes there existed a production gap when Kennedy assumed the presidency in January 1961 .

As per the historical data , GNP in 1955 was 438 billion dollars . Potential GNP with 3.3% growth rate anually . There was also recession and unemployment in the economy . If we see the growth rate of 3.3% , then after 6 years in 1961 potential GNP = 515 billion dollars ( approx) . The real was about 487 billion dollars .

Hence cearly there was a gap of 27 billion dollars ( approx) .

The critical issues and assumptions of tax cut debate are : a) with existing deficits , tax cuts will widen the fiscal deficits . Tax cuts would be a riskier method to balance the budget .

b) The purpose of this tax cut endeavour was to allure business investments . This would ultimately boost production and reduce unemployment . But if the businness firms did not invest as expected then such tax cuts can be a burden on the government trasury .

c) If high income groups are taxed then it would not be much effective . This is because high income groups already can afford all their needs , so the excess mney due to tax cuts will be saved . This will not create aggregate demand in the economy to rise .

It was a supply side tax cut . According to supply side theory , the purpose of a tax cut is to induce investment in production of goods and services . The production gap was tried to be recovered by tax cuts .


Related Solutions

According to life-cycle models of consumption, a $1000 tax cut would have the largest impact on consumption spending when
According to life-cycle models of consumption, a $1000 tax cut would have the largest impact on consumption spending whena. The tax cut is permanent b. The tax cut is temporary, and tax rates will steadily rise in subsequent years c. The tax cut is temporary, and tax rates will suddenly jump in subsequent years d. None of the above – A $1000 tax cut has the same impact on consumption spending regardless of whether it is temporary or permanent7. An...
Using the aggregate demand-aggregate supply model, predict what happens in the short run when the federal government enacts a cut in the personal income tax rates.
Using the aggregate demand-aggregate supply model, predict what happens in the short run when the federal government enacts a cut in the personal income tax rates. 1) The aggregate supply curve shifts right; the aggregate demand curve is not affected; price level decreases; real GDP increases. 2) The aggregate supply curve shifts left; the aggregate demand curve is not affected; price level increases; real GDP decreases. 3) The aggregate demand curve shifts right; the aggregate supply curve is not affected; price level and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT