Question

In: Finance

3. Fama and French (1992, 1993) argued that based on more recent data, beta is not...

3. Fama and French (1992, 1993) argued that based on more recent data, beta is not helpful in explaining the relationship between risk and return. Their work has received a great deal of attention, both in academic circles and in the popular press, with newspaper articles displaying headlines such as “Beta Is Dead!” If the CAPM is not perfect, why do we continue to use it in corporate finance and investment?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Why CAPM is used?

CAPM is still used in corporate finance & investment for the following reasons:

  • While the CAPM is not perfect, it is considered to be straightforward, relatively robust,, manipulation is difficult, correctly emphasizes the importance of market risk. As a result of all these benefits, it is considered to be the best available method for capital budgeting.
  • It helps the managers to think about the risk in a correct manner.
  • Even if the CAPM is not perfect, it gets the managers to think about risk which the shareholders can eliminate in their portfolios. They should try to focus & compensate the investors on the market risk decisions made by them.
  • Methods like NPV are considered to be appropriate for making investment decisions without having any impact on the portfolio of the investors.
  • In spite of it limitations, CAPM is considered to be the most popular model for discount rate determination on real investments in the financial sector.

Related Solutions

In Fama and French (1993), what are the three factors in their new model that significantly...
In Fama and French (1993), what are the three factors in their new model that significantly influence the expected return of a stock? Briefly explain.
Answer anyone question Question 1:  Fama and French (1993) have included a Size factor in their 3-factor...
Answer anyone question Question 1:  Fama and French (1993) have included a Size factor in their 3-factor model. Survey the most recent literature and discuss whether the Size factor is still present in financial markets (in the US and elsewhere). Using the Methodology of Fama and MacBeth (1973), test and discussion possible economic reasons why Size should be a priced factor. Requires a large literature base and a simple regression analysis. If you are fully prepared, I hope to write this...
a. Fama and French (1993) developed a three-factor asset pricing model. What are the three risk...
a. Fama and French (1993) developed a three-factor asset pricing model. What are the three risk factors in the Fama and French three-factor model? (1.5 marks) b. What risks the three factors can capture? c. What stocks are described as “value” and “growth” stocks under theoretical framework of Fama and French (1993)? d. Carhart (1997) extended the Fama and French three-factor model to a four-factor model. What is the fourth factor added to the Fama and French three-factor model? What...
Explain the CAPM and Fama-French 3-factor. Discuss the differences between these two models.
Explain the CAPM and Fama-French 3-factor. Discuss the differences between these two models.
Does the Fama and French 3 factor model argue their Small Minus Big factor reflects the...
Does the Fama and French 3 factor model argue their Small Minus Big factor reflects the extra riskiness of small stocks relative to large stocks?
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market is 14%, the risk-free rate is 2%, the expected return on the Small-Minus-Big (SMB) portfolio is 2%, and the expected return on the High-Minus-Low (HML) portfolio is 1.8%. Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) as a beta with respect to the market of 0.9, a beta with respect the SMB portfolio of -0.14, and a beta with respect to the HML portfolio of 0.1. According the...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market is 14%, the risk-free rate is 2%, the expected return on the Small-Minus-Big (SMB) portfolio is 1%, and the expected return on the High-Minus-Low (HML) portfolio is 1.3%. Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) as a beta with respect to the market of 0.9, a beta with respect the SMB portfolio of -0.12, and a beta with respect to the HML portfolio of 0.11. According the...
How do you compare the Capital asset pricing model to the 3 factors fama french model...
How do you compare the Capital asset pricing model to the 3 factors fama french model and 5 factor fama french model?
How do you compare the Capital asset pricing model to the 3 factors fama french model...
How do you compare the Capital asset pricing model to the 3 factors fama french model and 5 factor fama french model?
According to the Fama and French 3-factor model,do you think that the three factors included make...
According to the Fama and French 3-factor model,do you think that the three factors included make up a logical explanation of how share returns may be explained? What criticisms could be made of the model? (give academic support or example)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT