Question

In: Operations Management

ThyssenKrupp Elevator Canada INTRODUCTION During a lunchroom break, a male employee at ThyssenKrupp decided to take...

ThyssenKrupp Elevator Canada

INTRODUCTION During a lunchroom break, a male employee at ThyssenKrupp decided to take up a dare from a fellow colleague for $100 and the Jackass-like prank was videotaped then posted to YouTube. When it came to the attention of the HR manager and other senior management, the employee was fired for violating company policy. The employee argued in court that the organizational culture allowed such behaviour. But would the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) agree?

BACKGROUND ThyssenKrupp Elevator Canada was subcontracting elevator installation at a construction site in downtown Toronto where a large office building was being built. All the workers on the site, including those from ThyssenKrupp, and the main contractor of the site, PCL Construction, were male and the culture of the workplace was described as a “macho” environment where pranks were played. There were reportedly pictures of women and provocative calendars hanging on walls, as well as signs displaying vulgar humour. There was little concern about these as access to the building was restricted to people involved in the construction project. One of ThyssenKrupp's employees at the site was an elevator mechanic. He and several other employees engaged in what he called “picking” on each other and playing pranks to keep things light at work. They also watched pornographic scenes on a worker's iPod and episodes of the television show Jackass, which features individuals doing stupid activities on dares.

ESCALATION OF PRANK BEHAVIOUR Over a period of a few weeks, the mechanic and other employees performed more and more pranks that copied some of the ones they saw on the Jackass show. Typically these events took place in the basement lunchroom where employees gathered for breaks and meals, to change clothes, and to socialize. Soon, money was being offered on dares to do certain actions. For example, one ThyssenKrupp employee accepted a dare that involved a $60 payment—money collected from fellow employees, including three foremen. The dare involved the employee eating spoiled food found in the common refrigerator of the lunchroom. A couple of weeks after the first dare, the mechanic was observed playing with a stapler in the lunchroom on a break. One of the foremen walked in and jokingly said, “What are you going to do with that? Why don't you staple your nuts to something?” The mechanic jokingly replied that he'd do it “if you get enough money.” Though he claimed it was intended as a joke, word spread within a few hours, and soon $100 was raised among seven other ThyssenKrupp and three PCL employees. Another four people were in the lunchroom later that afternoon watching when the mechanic decided to go ahead with the staple dare. He proceeded to drop his work uniform trousers and staple his scrotum to a wooden plank, which was met by “cheering and high fives,” according to the mechanic. With the mechanic's knowledge, the prank was filmed on video. Included on-camera were all those employees present, wearing full worksite uniforms, PCL logos on hats, and TK shirt patches—all easily identifiable and recorded by a worker who was present that day. The mechanic was advised at a later date that the event was posted on YouTube. Initially, the mechanic did nothing about the YouTube posting, but eventually asked for it to be taken off the site. To ensure this was done, the mechanic went back to YouTube searching for the video clip, but couldn't find it. He assumed it had been removed, however it was not—he just didn't search correctly. In total, the video clip was assessable on YouTube for two weeks, during which time many employees in the construction industry watched it. It was during these two weeks that ThyssenKrupp became aware of the video after the HR department received an email with a link to the video, and several people discussed it with a ThyssenKrupp executive at a construction labour relations conference. Conference participants insisted the employee was from ThyssenKrupp, and they questioned how the company could allow something like that to happen during work hours. At this point, ThyssenKrupp management reviewed the video one more time and decided that the mechanic had violated its workplace harassment policy, which prohibited “practical jokes of a sexual nature which cause awkwardness or embarrassment.” The mechanic was fired for “a flagrant violation” of ThyssenKrupp's harassment policy and risking the company's reputation.

CULTURE AT FAULT Upon being fired from his job, the mechanic filed a grievance with the OLRB. He argued that dismissal was too harsh given the culture of the workplace which was accepting of that type of behaviour. He also said no one told him not to do it, no one expressed displeasure, and no one mentioned they were offended. He argued that other employees had done stunts but questioned why he was the only one disciplined for his actions. He also claimed to have never seen the workplace harassment policy, even though it was part of the orientation package.

THE DECISION In July 2011, the OLRB found the mechanic's misconduct on the employer's premises, plus his permission to record it, “patently unacceptable in almost any workplace.” The fact that his employer was easily identified in the video clip contributed to the decision. The fact that the mechanic claimed not to have known about the corporate harassment policy was irrelevant—he should have known better. The OLRB also dismissed as irrelevant that no one protested or objected to the prank during the lunch break, which the mechanic argued was “not during work hours.” The court stated that ThyssenKrupp has an interest in preventing such horseplay and stunts in the workplace. They are in a safety-sensitive industry and such employee misconduct places the firm's reputation in jeopardy. The seriousness of the mechanic's misconduct also superseded any other factors, such as his claim of being a good employee with a clean record and the argument around the culture. There was no evidence that the company was aware of other pranks, and his role as the principle offender wasn't diminished by the culture, said the board. In dismissing the mechanics grievance, the board stated, “If (ThyssenKrupp) employees want to emulate the principles of Jackass by self-abuse, they may be free to do so when they are not on the (employer's) premises and cannot be identified as being associated with (ThyssenKrupp).”

(2) Considering that the mechanic claimed that the ThyssenKrupp culture contributed to such behaviour, in your opinion, does ThyssenKrupp need to change its corporate culture? If not, why not?   


(3)  You have to take one side, either the company ThyssenKrupp or the fired employee. If you decide to represent ThyssenKrupp, then you are the defense lawyer. If you decide to represent the fired mechanic, you are the Plaintiff’s Lawyer. Present your arguments with evidences and supporting matter to the Judge.

Solutions

Expert Solution

2. In my opinion, ThyssenKrupp need not change its corporate culture.

ThyssenKrupp wanted its employees to work in lighter mood. As a happy and relax employee can be more productive in work place, to keep the environment lighter they used to play jokes and even pranks during leisure time. But the employees started violating the policy by adding vulgurity to the pranks. Here, nothing wrong about corporate culture of the company but company should properly monitor employees interactions to avoid such instances in future.

3. Here, I would like to represent ThyssenKrup. My arguments and evidences will be as mentioned below-

  • As per the company policy “practical jokes of a sexual nature which cause awkwardness or embarrassment.” is strictly prohibited in workplace. Stapling of scortum is clearly violence of this policy.
  • In video, employer name was clearly visible which keeps the company reputation in great risk.
  • Lunch time is company provided work break which can't be treated as non-working hour.
  • If employee knows, he was not trained on particular code of conduct, being an employee he should have volunturily approached concerned department to get trained on it.
  • If his collegues have never made him realise that his conduct was wrong, it doesn't mean company policy also accepts such act.

Related Solutions

Discussion. 1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada during your senior...
Discussion. 1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada during your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows.
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada during your senior year....
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada during your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows.
You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The trip...
You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows.
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The...
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows. **I hope for a non-repeated answer so...
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The...
1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows.
DISCUSSION 1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year....
DISCUSSION 1. You are planning to take a spring break trip to Canada your senior year. The trip is exactly two years away, but you want to be prepared and have enough money when the time comes. Explain how you would determine the amount of money you will have to save in order to pay for the trip. 2. Identify the steps involved in computing the present value when you have multiple cash flows.
you decided to take a break after grading all of the final exams for our course...
you decided to take a break after grading all of the final exams for our course and took a much-needed vacation. Unfortunately, he went surfing and was attacked by a shark that ate his arm. you, an expert one-handed swimmer, made his way back to shore. During his swim back, Group of answer choices 1. you sympathetic nervous system stimulated the smooth muscle around his arterioles to contract to increase his mean arterial pressure 2. you  pondered your history of making...
Suppose that during an unexpected snowstorm, Mr. Wong decided to take a random sample of students...
Suppose that during an unexpected snowstorm, Mr. Wong decided to take a random sample of students in his AP Statistics class to examine their arrival times, in minutes. He compared the difference between the students' arrival time with the time the class was supposed to begin. Mr. Wong asks you, his assistant, to use the information below to answer the following questions (negative value means that the student arrived BEFORE class began). Number of students 30 Mean -1.067 Q1 -24...
introduction on canada goose company. 400-500 words
introduction on canada goose company. 400-500 words
Take a stick of unit length and break it into three pieces, choosing the break point...
Take a stick of unit length and break it into three pieces, choosing the break point at random. (The break points are assumed to be chosen simultaneously). What is the probability that the three pieces can be used to form a triangle?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT