Question

Scamander Corporation is the parent of Credence Corporation and owns 100% of Credence. Scamander is interested in acquiring either the assets or the stock of Lestrange Corporation. Lestrange Corporation holds a valuable license to produce QPS equipment that Scamander is interested in obtaining. Lestrange Corporation has assets with FMV of $4,000,000 but with an adjusted basis of $1,000,000. Lestrange has liabilities of $600,000 and AE&P of $3,000.000. The majority of Lestrange shareholders are in favor of a takeover by Scamander but insist that it be tax-free. However, a few shareholders owning, in total, 15% of the Lestrange stock, are opposed to the takeover. They are willing to claim a dissenter’s right to be paid the value of their stock in cash. Some of the Scamander shareholders are concerned about assuming the liabilities of Lestrange.

Discuss four types of reorganizations that would provide a tax-free outcome for the shareholders. Explain the rules of these reorganizations, whether Scamander or Lestrange will recognize any gain or loss, and whether the shareholders will recognize any gain or loss. For this part of the problem, ignore the dissenting shareholders.

How would you answers in a) change if, as part of the takeover, the dissenting Lestrange shareholders will have to have their stock purchased for cash?

Answer 1

Tax-free reorganizations can be divided into the four sub parts :

Acquisitive reorganizations

Divisive reorganizations

Corporate restructuring reorganizations

Bankruptcy reorganizations

Tax rules

Dealing with a tax-exempt redesign is completely reliant on the expense locale an organization is in. A tax-exempt revamping is done not really to give an expense exception, and consequently put the organization at a superior position. It is done to decrease any assessment results of an officially approaching redesign. As such, a business revamping isn't activated by the need to lead a tax-exempt redesign. Or maybe, the tax-exempt revamping is activated when a business redesign is normal. With the approaching rebuilding, the business would like to neither acquire a duty advantage nor a disservice. Fundamentally, the expression "tax-exempt" is deluding on the grounds that the cost isn't altogether moderated, however might be conceded, exchanged or limited.