In: Finance
Recently, a lucky person won the lottery. The lottery winnings were reported to be $85.5 million. In reality, the winner got a choice of $2.85 million per year for 30 years or $46 million today.
a) Explain briefly why winning $2.85 million per year for 30 years is not equivalent to winning $85.5 million. You may use simple calculations (with assumptions such as an interest rate of 3% p.a.) to explain your answer.
b) The evening news interviewed a group of people the day after the winner was announced. When asked, most of them responded that, if they were the lucky winner, they would take the $46 million up-front payment. Suppose you were that lucky winner, how would you decide between the annual installments or the up-front payment?
Ans a. | |
We need to find the PV of the Annuity of $2.85 Million | |
per year . | |
Formula for present value of an anuuity = PV= A [ {(1+k)n-1}/k(1+k)n] | |
PV = Present value of Annuity | |
A = periodical investment=$2.85 Million | |
K=interest rate=3% pa | |
N=periods=30 years | |
PV =2.85*[(1.03^30-1)/(3%*1.03^30) | |
PV =$55.86M | |
So PV of $2.85 per year annuity for 30 years @3% rate is | $55.86 Million. |
So the PV of the annuity is not the same as $85 Million upfront payment. | |
Ans b. | |
As the PV of the $2.85 M annuity for 30 years is $55.86 Million, the | |
upfront payment of $46 Million as asked by respondents is lower | |
than that. | |
So it is advisable to get the Annuity than the upfront payment. |