In: Finance
Allen Products LP, wants to do a scenario analysis for the coming year. The pessimistic prediction for sales is $ 900,000; the most likely amount of sales is $ 1,118,000; and the optimistic prediction is $ 1,288,000. Allen's income statement for the most recent year is shown here
Allen Products, Inc. Income Statement for
the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Sales revenue $937,400
Less: cost of good sold 436,828
Gross profits $500,572
Less: operating expenses 245,599
Operating profits $254,973
Less: interest expense 30,934
Net profit before taxes $224,039
Less: taxes (rate 25%) 56,010
Net profits after taxes $168,029
a. Use the percent-of-sales method, the income statement for December 31,2019, and the sales revenue estimates to develop pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic pro forma income statements for the coming year.
b. Explain how this method could result in overstatement of profits for the pessimistic case and understatement of profits for the most likely and optimistic cases.
c. Restate the pro forma income statements prepared in part a. to incorporate the following assumptions about the costs:
$252,497 of the cost of goods sold is fixed; the rest is variable. $193,516 of the operating expenses is fixed; the rest is variable. All the interest expense is fixed.
d. Compare your findings in part c. to your findings in part a. Do your observations confirm your explanation in part b?
Use the percent-of-sales method, the income statement for December 31, 2019, and the sales revenue estimates to develop pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic pro forma income statements for the coming year.
Complete the pro forma income statement for the year ending December 31, 2020 that is shown below (pessimistic scenario): (Round the percentage of sales to one decimal place and the pro forma income statement accounts to the nearest dollar.)
Part a)
Dec 31, 2019 | Pessimistic | Most Likely | Optimistic | |||||
$ | % of sales | $ | $ | $ | ||||
Sales Revenue | 9,37,400 | 100% | A | Sales Revenue | 9,00,000 | 11,18,000 | 12,88,000 | |
Less: Cost of goods sold | 4,36,828 | 47% | B= 47%*A | Less: Cost of goods sold | 4,19,400 | 5,20,988 | 6,00,207 | |
Gross Profits | 5,00,572 | 53% | C= A-B | Gross Profits | 4,80,600 | 5,97,012 | 6,87,793 | |
Less: Operating Expenses | 2,45,599 | 26% | D=26%*A | Less: Operating Expenses | 2,35,800 | 2,92,916 | 3,37,456 | |
Operating profits | 2,54,973 | 27% | E=C-D | Operating profits | 2,44,800 | 3,04,096 | 3,50,336 | |
Less: Interest Expense | 30,934 | 3% | F=3%*A | Less: Interest Expense | 29,700 | 36,894 | 42,504 | |
Net Profit before taxes | 2,24,039 | 24% | G=E-F | Net Profit before taxes | 2,15,100 | 2,67,202 | 3,07,833 | |
Less taxes (25%) | 56,010 | 6% | H=25%*G | Less taxes (25%) | 53,775 | 66,801 | 76,958 | |
Net Profit after taxes | 1,68,029 | 18% | I=G-H | Net Profit after taxes | 1,61,325 | 2,00,402 | 2,30,874 |
Part b) |
A lot of expenses are fixed in nature either partially or wholly. The fixed expenses don't increase with increase in sales. However in percentage of sales method, all the expenses are assumed as variable wholly and increase with increase in sales. Hence even if the sales are higher for Most likely and optimistic scenario, due to increase in all the expenses in line with sales, the total profits after taxes are low and hence underestimated. And for Pessimistic scenario, even when the sales are low, due to low expenses, the total profits after taxes remain high and hence overestimated. |
Part c) |
Dec 31, 2019 | Pessimistic | Most Likely | Optimistic | |||||
$ | % of sales | $ | $ | $ | ||||
Sales Revenue | 9,37,400 | 100% | A | Sales Revenue | 9,00,000 | 11,18,000 | 12,88,000 | |
Less: Cost of goods sold | 4,36,828 | B=C+D | Less: Total Cost of goods sold (Fixed plus variable) | 4,29,474 | 4,72,341 | 5,05,770 | ||
Fixed COGS | 2,52,497 | C | Fixed COGS | 2,52,497 | 2,52,497 | 2,52,497 | ||
Variable COGS (Total-Fixed) | 1,84,331 | 20% | D=20%*A | Variable COGS | 1,76,977 | 2,19,844 | 2,53,273 | |
Gross Profits | 5,00,572 | E=A-B | Gross Profits | 4,70,526 | 6,45,659 | 7,82,230 | ||
Less: Operating Expenses | 2,45,599 | F=G+H | Less: Total Operating Expenses (Fixed plus variable) | 2,43,521 | 2,55,633 | 2,65,079 | ||
Fixed Operating ex | 1,93,516 | G | Fixed Operating ex | 1,93,516 | 1,93,516 | 1,93,516 | ||
Variable Operating ex (Total-Fixed) | 52,083 | 6% | H=6%*A | Variable Operating ex | 50,005 | 62,117 | 71,563 | |
Operating profits | 2,54,973 | I=E-F | Operating profits | 2,27,005 | 3,90,025 | 5,17,151 | ||
Less: Interest Expense | 30,934 | J | Less: Interest Expense | 30,934 | 30,934 | 30,934 | ||
Net Profit before taxes | 2,24,039 | K=I-J | Net Profit before taxes | 1,96,071 | 3,59,091 | 4,86,217 | ||
Less taxes (25%) | 56,010 | L=25%*K | Less taxes (25%) | 49,018 | 89,773 | 1,21,554 | ||
Net Profit after taxes | 1,68,029 | M=K-L | Net Profit after taxes | 1,47,054 | 2,69,319 | 3,64,663 |
Part d) |
Pessimistic | Most Likely | Optimistic | |
$ | $ | $ | |
Part b Profits after taxes | 1,47,054 | 2,69,319 | 3,64,663 |
Part a Profits after taxes | 1,61,325 | 2,00,402 | 2,30,874 |
Difference | -14,272 | 68,917 | 1,33,788 |
After comparing Part a and Part c, it is clearly visible that the profits were overestimated by $14,272 in Pessimistic scenario; the profits were underestimated by $68,917 & $133,788 in Most likely and Optimistic scenarios respectively. Clearly the observations in Part c get confirmed. |