In: Statistics and Probability
Include null and alternate hypothesis, a p-value, and a conclusion PRIVATE about the null hypothesis
Nine students took the SAT. After taking it, they then took a test preparation course and retook the SAT. Can you conclude that the course changes performance on the SAT? (use α = .1)
| 
 Before  | 
 720  | 
 860  | 
 850  | 
 880  | 
 860  | 
 710  | 
 850  | 
 1200  | 
 950  | 
| 
 After  | 
 740  | 
 860  | 
 840  | 
 920  | 
 890  | 
 720  | 
 840  | 
 1240  | 
 970  | 
| Before | After | Difference | 
| 720 | 740 | -20 | 
| 860 | 860 | 0 | 
| 850 | 840 | 10 | 
| 880 | 920 | -40 | 
| 860 | 890 | -30 | 
| 710 | 720 | -10 | 
| 850 | 840 | 10 | 
| 1200 | 1240 | -40 | 
| 950 | 970 | -20 | 
∑d = -140
∑d² = 5200
n = 9
Mean , x̅d = Ʃd/n = -140/9 = -15.5556
Standard deviation, sd = √[(Ʃd² - (Ʃd)²/n)/(n-1)] = √[(5200-(-140)²/9)/(9-1)] = 19.4365
Null and Alternative hypothesis:
Ho : µd = 0
H1 : µd ≠ 0
Test statistic:
t = (x̅d)/(sd/√n) = (-15.5556)/(19.4365/√9) = -2.4010
df = n-1 = 8
Critical value :
Two tailed critical value, t-crit = T.INV.2T(0.1, 8) = 1.860
Reject Ho if t < -1.86 or if t > 1.86
p-value :
Two tailed p-value = T.DIST.2T(ABS(-2.401), 8) = 0.0431
Decision:
p-value < α, Reject the null hypothesis
Conclusion:
There is enough evidence to conclude that the course changes performance on the SAT at 0.1 significance level.