Economies of scope is when long term costs for a company
decreases, not due to increase in volume of production (that is
economies of scale) but due to increase in variety of production.
An economy of scope means that the production of one good reduces
the cost of producing another related good.
How does this apply to Mondelez and Hershey merger:
- A larger company is able to offer a wider choice of custom
products. Rather than just producing off-the-peg models, a firm can
produce a greater range of products to cater to every taste and
preference. Mondelez may not have been able to Hershey market
because of consumer preferences. Internalising it by a merger will
help sales of Mondelez or Hershey, either way, Mondelez
profits.
- Cut costs that go on competitive research and prices. These
costs can be better utilised for quality augmentation and improving
the supply chain, thus raising sales.
- Geographical expansion: Pockets of world may differently have
preferences for either Hersheys or Mondelez. But with a merger,
these geographical reach is evened out. It can offer regional
variations.
- Goods in Hershe and Mondelez with same production process can
be produced together reducing costs of production. Because both the
companies manufacture many close goods, it is feasible to assume
that many of them undergo similar production.
- Reduced anticipation of future: Both competitors may be under
pressure to cater to changing consumer preferences and look to beat
each other with different products. The research and manpower
behind this effort can be saved substantially.
All the benefits that accrue from the merger will go into
lowering the long term costs or augmenting sales of the
company.
Thanks!