In: Accounting
22 a
Assume the following S corporations and gross receipts, passive investment income, and corporate E&P. Will any of these corporations have its S election terminated due to excessive passive income? If so, in what year? All became S corporations at the beginning of year 1. (Leave no answer blank. Select "NA" if no effect.)
a. Clarion Corp.
Gross | Passive Investment | Corporate Earnings | ||||||
Year | Receipts | Income | and Profits | |||||
1 | $ |
1,353,958 |
$ | 252,500 | $ | 321,600 | ||
2 | $ | 1,230,789 | $ | 102,500 | $ | 321,600 | ||
3 | $ | 1,140,306 | $ | 302,500 | $ | 231,000 | ||
4 | $ | 1,347,663 | $ | 352,500 | $ | 100,600 | ||
5 | $ | 1,500,860 | $ | 402,500 | $ | 0 | ||
b. Hanson Corp.
Gross | Passive Investment | Corporate Earnings | ||||||
Year | Receipts | Income | and Profits | |||||
1 | $ | 1,430,600 | $ | 249,400 | $ | 138,379 | ||
2 | $ | 700,780 | $ | 202,400 | $ | 100,400 | ||
3 | $ | 849,540 | $ | 191,200 | $ | 100,400 | ||
4 | $ | 830,660 | $ | 212,400 | $ | 80,300 | ||
5 | $ | 1,000,905 | $ | 259,790 | $ | 80,300 | ||
c. Tiffany Corp.
Gross | Passive Investment | Corporate Earnings | |||
Year | Receipts | Income | and Profits | ||
1 | $ | 1,001,138 | $ | 251,800 | $0 |
2 | $ | 703,500 | $ | 302,280 | $0 |
3 | $ | 800,745 | $ | 402,170 | $0 |
4 | $ | 900,630 | $ | 352,270 | $0 |
5 | $ | 671,000 | $ | 292,177 | $0 |
d. Jonas Corp.
Gross | Passive Investment | Corporate Earnings | |||
Year | Receipts | Income | and Profits | ||
1 | $ | 1,100,950 | $ | 252,000 | $530 |
2 | $ | 998,100 | $ | 241,000 | $430 |
3 | $ | 800,650 | $ | 232,000 | $330 |
4 | $ | 803,500 | $ | 216,570 | $230 |
5 | $ | 750,600 | $ | 202,000 | $130 |
would the S election be terminated?when?
S corporations will terminated because of excessive income.
S Election will got terminated because of excessive passive income if its passive investment income surpasses 25% of gross receipts for 3 successive years and has accumulated E&P from the period when it operated as C Corporation.
a) Clarion corporations
because of excessive passive income if its passive investment income surpasses 25% of gross receipts for 3 successive years and has accumulated E&P from the period when it operated as C Corporation.
Year | Gross receipts | passive income | passive income% | %calculation | corporate earnings |
1 |
$1,353,958 |
$252500 | 18.64% | ($252500/$1353958)*100 | $321,600 |
2 | $1230789 | $102500 | 8.33% | ($102500/$1230789)*100 | $321600 |
3 | $1140306 | $302500 | 26.53% | ($302500/$1140306)*100 | $321000 |
4 | $1347663 | $352500 | 26.16% | ($352500/$1347663)*100 | $100600 |
5 | $1500860 | $402500 | 26.82% | ($402500/$1500860)*100 | $0 |
C corporations has more investment income for more then 3 years i.e. more than 25%. But it doesn't have any earnings in 5th year so, the s corporations not get terminated.
b) Hanson corporations
Years | Gross receipts | passive income | calculation | passive income% | corporate earnings |
1 | $1480600 | $249400 | ($249400/$1480600)*100 | 16.84% | $138379 |
2 | $700780 | $202400 | ($202400/$700780)*100 | 28.88% | $100400 |
3 | $849540 | $191200 | ($191200/$849540)*100 | 22.51% | $100400 |
4 | $830660 | $212400 | ($212400/$830660)*100 | 25.57% | $80300 |
5 | $1000905 | $259790 | ($259790/$1000905)*100 | 25.96% | $80300 |
As like the first one this one also has the same 3 or more years more than 25%
c)Tifanny corporations
Year | Gross receipts | passive income | passive income% | calculation | corporate earnings |
1 | $1001138 | $251800 | 25.15% | ($251800/$1001138)*100 | $0 |
2 | $703500 | $302280 | 42.97% | ($302280/$703500)*100 | $0 |
3 | $800745 | $402170 | 50.22% | ($402170/$800745)*100 | $0 |
4 | $900630 | $352270 | 39.11% | ($352270/$900630)*100 | $0 |
5 | $671000 | $292177 | 43.54% | ($292177/$671000)*100 | $0 |
The s election terminated on the T corporations as this year the t corporations has excessive passive income in all the five years and the corporate earnings are $0 for each year
d) Jonas corporations
Years | Gross receipts | passive income | passive income% | corporate earnings | |
1 | $1100950 | $252000 | 22.89% | $530 | |
2 | $998100 | $241000 | 24.15% | $430 | |
3 | $800650 | $232000 | 28.98% | $330 | |
4 | $803500 | $216570 | 26.95% | $230 | |
5 | $750600 | $202000 | 26.91% | $130 |
By considering all the above cases in the part of Tifanny corporations the s election would be terminated.