Question

In: Accounting

The naïve investor hypothesis and the no effects hypothesis are two competing hypotheses to study accounting...

The naïve investor hypothesis and the no effects hypothesis are two competing hypotheses to study accounting method changes. What do these two hypotheses say and which hypothesis is accepted by the research?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Naive investor hypothesis is best described as a rough and, more or less, instinctive common-sense division of a portfolio, without bothering with sophisticated mathematical models. At worst, say some experts, this approach can make portfolios highly risky. Then again, some recent research indicates that this kind of informed, but poorly logical division, is just as effective as those fancy, optimising formulae.

The null hypothesis is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena, or no association among groups.
Testing (accepting, approving, rejecting, or disproving) the null hypothesis—and thus concluding that there are or are not grounds for believing that there is a relationship between two phenomena. The field of statistics gives precise criteria for rejecting a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is generally assumed to be true until evidence indicates otherwise.

Each of us is potentially a naive investor. If we make this mistake, then we invest without a strong grasp of the return potential of the investment and the risks to the outcome. While obviously this can lead to poor specific investment outcomes, we also end up with poorly constructed portfolios because we aren’t aware of the risks we are trying to balance. It can even leave you open to fraud.


Related Solutions

Why is it important to develop hypotheses for a study? What purpose does a hypothesis serve...
Why is it important to develop hypotheses for a study? What purpose does a hypothesis serve and how could it be tested?
Two competing drugs are available for treating a specific ailment. There are no apparent side effects...
Two competing drugs are available for treating a specific ailment. There are no apparent side effects from drug 1. Whereas (nausea and headaches from drug 2. A group of researchers has decided however that they are willing to recommend drug 2 if the proportion of cures for drug 2 is higher than that of drug 1. The researchers use both drugs experimentally on people who are suffering from the ailment. By the end of experiment 52 of 80 treated with...
what does the research hypothesis or hypotheses mean?
what does the research hypothesis or hypotheses mean?
Evaluate the following hypotheses. Is it or is it not a good scientific hypothesis?  IF IT IS,...
Evaluate the following hypotheses. Is it or is it not a good scientific hypothesis?  IF IT IS, then how might you go about confirming or falsifying the hypothesis? IF IT IS NOT, then make a suggestion about something we could change about the hypothesis to make it more scientific. 1).Compared to all other objects in the universe, humans are about average-sized. 2).The first sentence on page 20 of The Illyrian Adventure by Lloyd Alexander (Yearling Books, 1986) reads, "Vesper grinned all...
Review the case study " The merger of Two Competing Hospitals" . The merger phenomenon has...
Review the case study " The merger of Two Competing Hospitals" . The merger phenomenon has been widely observed in the hospital, pharmaceutical and airline in the past decade. If you are the healthcare consultant facilitating the merger between Portor Regional Medical Center (PRMC) and Banner Regional Medical Center (BRMC), what three strategic issues that you would focus on and offer guidance. Include appropriate rationale for your choices and discuss how you would address them to the satisfaction of the...
In hypothesis testing, we state two different hypotheses? What are they? As researcher, which do we...
In hypothesis testing, we state two different hypotheses? What are they? As researcher, which do we believe to be true? Which do we assume to be true at first and put to the test?
You are given the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis: p = 0.3 Alternative hypothesis: ? ≠ 0.30...
You are given the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis: p = 0.3 Alternative hypothesis: ? ≠ 0.30 You decide to take a sample of size 90. Suppose we will reject the null hypothesis if the probability of an outcome as surprising as ?̂ occurring is less than 5%. (i.e., a “p-value” of .05). What values ?̂ would cause us to reject the null hypothesis? Hint: Your answer should be “if ?̂ is anything bigger than ____ or anything smaller than____.”
Explain the following: Concepts of Hypothesis Testing Hypotheses Test for a population mean Hypothesis test for...
Explain the following: Concepts of Hypothesis Testing Hypotheses Test for a population mean Hypothesis test for a population proportion Test of normality Chi-Square Test for Independence
What are the two, main statistics calculated in the study to test a hypothesis.
What are the two, main statistics calculated in the study to test a hypothesis.
A study was conducted to determine the effects of two factors on the latherability of soap....
A study was conducted to determine the effects of two factors on the latherability of soap. The two factors were type of water (tap or distilled) and glycerol (present or absent). The outcome measured was the amount of foam produced (in milliliters). The experiment was repeated three times for each combination of the factors. The results are as follows. No Glycerol Glycerol Distilled Water 165   181   168 170   197   190 Tap Water 155   142   139 139   160   160 Analyze the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT