In: Operations Management
Laws are enacted by Congress, and the courts apply those laws to the facts of a case to reach a decision. For cases that get appealed to the United States Supreme Court, the nine justices often do not reach unanimous decisions. Explain in substantial detail how judges that are interpreting the same laws and the same facts may reach different conclusions, and specifically comment on how it is never simply because a judge may be Republican or Democrat.
****Please please please LIKE THIS ANSWER, so that I can get a small benefit, Please****
Judges may may come to different conclusions even though they are interpreting the same laws and constitution because different judges uses a different way in interpreting the laws.Some of the elements judges use in interpreting law and that makes them end up in different conclusion include:
Explanation:
Judges that are interpreting the same laws and the same facts may reach different conclusions,Even though a judge may be Republican or Democrat.This because every judge uses a different skill in interpreting the laws.Additionally,judicial decision are also affected by internal or external factors may may be based on ideology,personal,legal and political influence.
****Please please please LIKE THIS ANSWER, so that I can get a small benefit, Please****