In: Accounting
Accounting Rate of Return Each of the following scenarios is independent. Assume that all cash flows are after-tax cash flows. Cobre Company is considering the purchase of new equipment that will speed up the process for extracting copper. The equipment will cost $3,700,000 and have a life of 5 years with no expected salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows: Year Cash Revenues Cash Expenses 1 $6,000,000 $4,800,000 2 6,000,000 4,800,000 3 6,000,000 4,800,000 4 6,000,000 4,800,000 5 6,000,000 4,800,000 Emily Hansen is considering investing in one of the following two projects. Either project will require an investment of $75,000. The expected cash revenues minus cash expenses for the two projects follow. Assume each project is depreciable. Year Project A Project B 1 $22,500 $22,500 2 30,000 30,000 3 45,000 45,000 4 75,000 22,500 5 75,000 22,500 Suppose that a project has an ARR of 30% (based on initial investment) and that the average net income of the project is $120,000. Suppose that a project has an ARR of 50% and that the investment is $200,000.
Required: 1. Compute the ARR on the new equipment that Cobre Company is considering. Round your answer to one decimal place. % 2. Conceptual Connection: Which project should Emily Hansen choose based on the ARR? Notice that the payback period is the same for both investments (thus equally preferred). Unlike the payback period, explain why ARR correctly signals that one project should be preferred over the other. ARR Project A 46 % Project B 18 % Based on the ARR, Emily Hansen chosen Project A . 3. How much did the company in Scenario c invest in the project? Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar. $ 4. What is the average net income earned by the project in Scenario d?
1) COBRE COMPANY | ||||
COST OF EQUIPMENT ($) | 37,00,000 | |||
LIFE IN YRS | 5 | |||
SALVAGE VALUE | 0 | |||
EXPECTED CASH FLOW | ||||
YEAR | CASH REVENUE | CASH EXPENSES | NET CASH FLOW | |
1 | 6000000 | 4800000 | 1200000 | |
2 | 6000000 | 4800000 | 1200000 | |
3 | 6000000 | 4800000 | 1200000 | |
4 | 6000000 | 4800000 | 1200000 | |
5 | 6000000 | 4800000 | 1200000 | |
TOTAL $ | 30000000 | 24000000 | 6000000 | |
AVERAGE INCOME = | NET CASH FLOW/5 | 1200000 | ||
NET INITIAL INVESTMENT | 37,00,000 | |||
ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN=AV. INCOME/NET INITIAL . INVESTMENT | ||||
ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN (%) | 32.4 | |||
2) EMILY HANSEN | ||||
PROJECT A | PROJECT B | |||
INVESTMENT ($) | 75000 | 75000 | ||
YEAR | NET CASH INFLOW | NET CASH INFLOW | ||
1 | 22500 | 22500 | ||
2 | 30000 | 30000 | ||
3 | 45000 | 45000 | ||
4 | 75000 | 22500 | ||
5 | 75000 | 22500 | ||
TOTAL $ | 247500 | 142500 | ||
AV. INCOME $ | 49500 | 28500 | ||
NET INITIAL INVESTMENT $ | 75000 | 75000 | ||
ARR % | 66 | 38 | ||
BASED ON ARR, EMILY HANSEN SHOULD CHOOSE PROJECT A. | ||||
Superiority of ARR over payback period | ||||
i) Pay back period completely ignores all cash inflow after the pay back period. | ||||
ii)Pay back method does not take into account the entire life of the project during which | ||||
cash flow are generated. As a result, projects with larger cash inflows in the latter part of | ||||
their lives may be rejected in favour of less profitable projects which happens to generate | ||||
a larger proportion of their cash inflows in the earlier part of their lives. | ||||
3) | ||||
ARR(based on initial investment) | 30% | |||
AV. NET INCOME ($) | 120000 | |||
INVESTMENT ($) | ? | |||
ARR=AV. NET INCOME/NET INVESTMENT | ||||
NET INVESTMENT ($) | 400000 | |||
4) | ||||
ARR | 50% | |||
INVESTMENT ($) | 200000 | |||
AV. NET INCOME | ? | |||
ARR=AV. NET INCOME/NET INVESTMENT | ||||
AV. NET INCOME $ | 100000 | |||