In: Economics
Enviroment necessities
The issue of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon is one of the
simpler more well established
impact categories that could be potentially used within the context
of an environmental label for
food. It is however just a single issue and with respect to the
impacts of food production and
consumption and in relation to omni-labelling, there are more
impact areas to consider many of
which are not so well established and also contain significant
areas of uncertainty. The impact areas
include:
Air quality
Biodiversity
Climate change
Landscape and heritage
Noise
Odour
Resource use
Soil quality
Stratospheric ozone depletion
Waste and recycling
Water quality
The International Standards Organisation (ISO), as part of its
ISO 14000 series of environmental
standards, has classified environmental labels into three
typologies – Type I, II and III and has also
specified the preferential principles and procedures for each
Type I labels are normally voluntary, multi-criteria based,
third party verified schemes that award a
licence to use the scheme label/logo for specific products or
services that meet prescribed standards
based on a life cycle assessment approach including, for example,
energy and water consumption,
emissions, disposal,
Type ll of label is the most widely used to provide
environmental information to consumers and
other stakeholders. According to the official ISO definition, they
are not awarded or verified by an
independent authority but usually developed internally by companies
and tend to take the form of a
declaration, a logo, a commercial,
Type III labels are one of the most detailed forms of providing
environmental information and like
Type I are based on life cycle impacts. These types of labels are
product specific and do not normally
assess or weight the environmental performance of the products they
describe but only the raw
data, such as the quantity of emissions, is provided. Their
evaluation is left to the consumer.
Producer necessities
There are many areas where eco-labels can offer benefits to industry producer which can be necessery for producer to obtain maximum benifit
Price premiums and economic incentives;
Improved corporate reputation and positive brand impact;
Implies a strong corporate governance;
Can improve relationships with regulators;
Can help with risk mitigation and management (crisis avoidance,
defence of existing markets,
reduced risk of business disruption, avoidance of fines for
environmental pollution);
May provide a competitive advantage and access to new
markets;
Identification of potential cost reductions such as waste
minimisation, efficiency improvements
and/or reduced insurance costs.