Question

In: Computer Science

How would you compare MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle, SQLite based on current version, operating system, cost, written...

How would you compare MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle, SQLite based on current version, operating system, cost, written in, licensing, graphical management tools, and maximum number of records?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Name Microsoft SQL Server  X MySQL  X SQLite  X
Description Microsofts relational DBMS Widely used open source RDBMS Widely used embeddable, in-process RDBMS
Primary database model Relational DBMS Relational DBMS Relational DBMS
Secondary database models Document store
Graph DBMS
Document store
DB-Engines Ranking
Trend Chart
Score 1043.12
Rank #3   Overall
#3   Relational DBMS
Score 1256.38
Rank #2   Overall
#2   Relational DBMS
Score 125.43
Rank #9   Overall
#6   Relational DBMS
Website www.microsoft.com/­en-us/­sql-server www.mysql.com www.sqlite.org
Technical documentation docs.microsoft.com/­en-US/­sql/­sql-server dev.mysql.com/­doc www.sqlite.org/­docs.html
Developer Microsoft Oracle Dwayne Richard Hipp
Initial release 1989 1995 2000
Current release SQL Server 2019, November 2019 8.0.21, 2020 3.33.0 (August 14, 2020), August 2020
License commercial Open Source Open Source
Cloud-based only no no no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)
  • ScaleGrid for MySQL: Fully managed MySQL hosting on AWS, Azure and DigitalOcean with high availability and SSH access on the #1 multi-cloud DBaaS.
  • Azure Database for MySQL: A fully managed, scalable MySQL relational database with high availability and security built in at no extra cost
Implementation language C++ C and C++ C
Server operating systems Linux
Windows
FreeBSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows
server-less
Data scheme yes yes yes
Typing yes yes yes
XML support yes yes no
Secondary indexes yes yes yes
SQL yes yes yes
APIs and other access methods ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)
ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API
ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Supported programming languages C#
C++
Delphi
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Visual Basic
Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl
Actionscript
Ada
Basic
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Forth
Fortran
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
PL/SQL
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Scheme
Smalltalk
Tcl
Server-side scripts Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java yes no
Triggers yes yes yes
Partitioning methods tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation horizontal partitioning, sharding with MySQL Cluster or MySQL Fabric none
Replication methods yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
none
MapReduce no no no
Consistency concepts Immediate Consistency Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys yes yes yes
Transaction concepts ACID ACID ACID
Concurrency yes yes yes
Durability yes yes yes
In-memory capabilities yes yes yes

Name

MySQL  X Oracle  X SQLite  X
Description Widely used open source RDBMS Widely used RDBMS Widely used embeddable, in-process RDBMS
Primary database model Relational DBMS Relational DBMS Relational DBMS
Secondary database models Document store Document store
Graph DBMS
RDF store
DB-Engines Ranking
Trend Chart
Score 1256.38
Rank #2   Overall
#2   Relational DBMS
Score 1368.77
Rank #1   Overall
#1   Relational DBMS
Score 125.43
Rank #9   Overall
#6   Relational DBMS
Website www.mysql.com www.oracle.com/­database www.sqlite.org
Technical documentation dev.mysql.com/­doc docs.oracle.com/­en/­database www.sqlite.org/­docs.html
Developer Oracle Oracle Dwayne Richard Hipp
Initial release 1995 1980 2000
Current release 8.0.21, 2020 19c, February 2019 3.33.0 (August 14, 2020), August 2020
License Open Source commercial Open Source
Cloud-based only no no no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)
  • Azure Database for MySQL: A fully managed, scalable MySQL relational database with high availability and security built in at no extra cost
  • ScaleGrid for MySQL: Fully managed MySQL hosting on AWS, Azure and DigitalOcean with high availability and SSH access on the #1 multi-cloud DBaaS.
Implementation language C and C++ C and C++ C
Server operating systems FreeBSD
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows
AIX
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris
Windows
z/OS
server-less
Data scheme yes yes yes
Typing yes yes yes
XML support yes yes no
Secondary indexes yes yes yes
SQL yes yes yes
APIs and other access methods ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API
JDBC
ODBC
ODP.NET
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)
ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Supported programming languages Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Cobol
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Fortran
Groovy
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Objective C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Tcl
Visual Basic
Actionscript
Ada
Basic
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Forth
Fortran
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
PL/SQL
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Scheme
Smalltalk
Tcl
Server-side scripts yes PL/SQL no
Triggers yes yes yes
Partitioning methods horizontal partitioning, sharding with MySQL Cluster or MySQL Fabric horizontal partitioning none
Replication methods Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
none
MapReduce no no no
Consistency concepts Immediate Consistency Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys yes yes yes
Transaction concepts ACID ACID ACID
Concurrency yes yes yes
Durability yes yes yes
In-memory capabilities yes yes yes
User concepts Users with fine-grained authorization concept fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard no

Difference between MySQL and SQLite:

   

                     sqllite                                                                                                                           MS SQL server

1. It was developed By D. Richard Hipp in August 2000. It was developed by Microsoft Corporation and initially released on April 24, 1989.
2. SQLite is developed only in C language. MS SQL server is written in C and C++.
3. The primary database model for SQLite is RDBMS. The primary database model for MS SQL Server is also RDBMS
4. The license for SQLite is open-source. The license for MS SQL Server is commercial.
5. There is no secondary database model for SQLite. The secondary database model for MS SQL Server are Document store and Graph DBMS.
6. SQLite does not support XML data format. MS SQL Server supports XML data format.
7. In SQLite, the data schema is dynamic. In MS SQL Server, the data schema is fixed.
8. It does not support any replication methods. It supports replication methods but depending on the SQL-Server Edition.
9. SQLite does not require a server to run. Hence, it is serverless. Server operating systems for MS SQL Server are Linux and Windows.
10. It supports in-memory capabilities. It also supports in-memory capabilities.
11. SQLite does not support Map Reduce method. MS SQL Server also does not supports Map Reduce method.

Differences between SQL and SQLite :

SQL SQLite
SQL is Structured Query Language used to query Relational Database System. It is written in C language. SQLite is an Relational Database Management System which is written in ANSI-C.
SQL is standard which specifies how relational schema is created, data is inserted or updated in relations, transactions are started and stopped, etc. SQLite is file-based. It is different from other SQL databases because unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have separate server process.
Main components of SQL are Data Definition Language(DDL), Data Manipulation Language(DML), Data Control Language(DCL). SQLite supports many features of SQL and has high performance but does not support stored procedures.
SQL is Structured Query Language which is used with databases like MySQL, Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, etc. SQLite is portable database resource. It could get an extension in whatever programming language used to access that database.
A conventional SQL database needs to be running as service like OracleDB to connect to and provide lot of functionalities. SQLite database system does not provide such functionalities.
SQL is query language which is used by other SQL databases. It is not database itself. SQLite is relational database management system itself which uses SQL.

Related Solutions

What would a comparison matrix look like between: MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle, and SQLite based on the...
What would a comparison matrix look like between: MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle, and SQLite based on the following information: current version, operating system, cost, written in, licensing, graphical management tools, and maximum number of records
how the interpretation of current value based financial statement would differ from using historical cost based...
how the interpretation of current value based financial statement would differ from using historical cost based account
How would you characterize the performance of Java-based code relative to the same program written (competently)...
How would you characterize the performance of Java-based code relative to the same program written (competently) in C#?
If you have utilized an activity-based costing system in your former or current employment, describe how...
If you have utilized an activity-based costing system in your former or current employment, describe how this system had been used. In your response, be sure to include your experience and position on the effectiveness of the activity-based costing system. Support your ideas by drawing on your readings and scholarly articles. If you have not encountered this type of system in your work experience, assume a company needs to switch to an ABC system. Describe the common cost drivers that...
Why do the current costing system and activity-based costing systems differ in the cost ?
Why do the current costing system and activity-based costing systems differ in the cost ?
You have learned that inventory may be written down to its current replacement cost or its...
You have learned that inventory may be written down to its current replacement cost or its net realizable value if these amounts are lower than original cost. Why do you think the accounting profession has decided to violate the cost concept and reduce the value of inventory in these circumstances?
a)Why would a product costing system based on a single, volume-based cost driver tend to overcost...
a)Why would a product costing system based on a single, volume-based cost driver tend to overcost high-volume products in comparison to an activity-based costing system? b) The first ‘Real Life’ in ‘When should ABC be used?’ suggests that the adoption of activity-based costing in Australia and New Zealand has not been as high as one might expect. What limitations and other challenges to implementing activity-based costing may be impacting the adoption of activity-based costing?
Based on the information below please provide the following: How does AAPL's current price compare to...
Based on the information below please provide the following: How does AAPL's current price compare to the estimated price? Using the industry and sector P/Es, compare both for the TTM and estimated year-end- Is it higher or lower? Provide one rational reason why. Firm Stock Symbol Current Share Price Firm P/E Ratio (TTM) Firm P/E High Last 5 yrs. Firm P/E Low Last 5 yrs. Industry P/E Ratio (TTM) Sector P/E Ratio (TTM) Selected Firm Apple AAPL 179.18 15.08 18.87...
Compare and contrast the case based analysis (qualitative) versus a surveillance system (quantitative) approach and how...
Compare and contrast the case based analysis (qualitative) versus a surveillance system (quantitative) approach and how each contributes or detracts from improving patient safety initiatives, reporting and outcomes.
In order to compare WoolCorp’s current method with activity-based costing, you interview the production staff and...
In order to compare WoolCorp’s current method with activity-based costing, you interview the production staff and compile the following information, which relates to the costs for raw wool and wool yarn. Type of Cost Activity Base Total Cost Sorting Hours of sorting $25,600 Cleaning Units of cleaning machine power 38,400 Combing Hours of combing machine use 1,300 Raw Wool Wool Yarn Hours of sorting required 1,000 4,000 Units of cleaning machine power required 1,800 4,200 Hours of combing machine use...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT