In: Operations Management
Discussion: Managing Risks Associated with Compressing the Project Schedule
What are the options for the project team when it becomes clear from the network/PERT diagram and critical path that the project is scheduled to take longer than the sponsor and senior stakeholders expect? This is a common situation and it is important for project managers to prepare themselves to address this situation and systematically consider the options.
We will start our schedule compression analysis with the assumption that all the work packages and associated activities currently in the schedule should remain as part of the project scope. Project managers can consider two techniques; fast-tracking and crashing. You began your study of these techniques in Week 3. We continue to focus on them this week, and you will be applying them to your project schedules in Week 5.
How can you decide, which, if either, technique to use? What are the strengths and limitations of each technique? What are the risks associated with each technique?
Fast tracking and crashing are the schedule compression techniques used by the project manager to shorten the duration of the project. These techniques are employed if the project is running behind schedule but the team wants to finish in the pre-stipulated time. These techniques can also be employed if overall project cost needs to be lowered.
This method does not require any additional resource, just a consideration is needed to rearrange the overall processes in the project. This method must be used if the project duration needs to be shortened without incurring any additional cost.
This method must be employed if fast tracking technique was not effective or the project manager does not want to increase potential risks of the project.