Question

Using mils and miliband provide the elitist and marxist arguments against pluralism

Answer 1

Using mils and miliband provide the elitist and marxist arguments against pluralism

Elitist theory of power

In all societies and political organisations there exists a small class of rulers and decision-makers that performs key political functions andmonopolises power, and a larger class that is ruled over and largely passive and marginalised in political affairs.

The decision world class is drawn from the higher echelons of political office,the corporate segment and the military; an almost aristocratic'natureto this self-propagating elites exercise of intensity.

For Pareto first class control is an inescapable result of huge scaleorganisations (a division of work), identified with Roberto Michels 'idea the iron law of theocracy.

marxist arguments

"The straightforward thought is that the arrangement procedure, far frombeing a reasonable weighing up of alternatives, is drivenby amazing financial powers that set theagenda, structure leaders decisions, constrainimplementation and guarantee that the interests of themost ground-breaking (or of the system as a whole)determines the yields and the results of thepolitical framework".

The state‟s function is to protect and reproducecapitalism.Public policies thus reflect the role of the state intrying to regulate the economy and ensure socialand political stability.

In other words, the state formulates and implementspolicy to reflect the interests of capitalism and thecapitalist/ruling class.

Pluralism Analysed

• Political power is fragmented and dispersed.
• The existence of classes, political parties, status groups, pressure groups,interest groups, etc. testifies to the distribution of power
• Gatherings give a more viable methods for portrayal than decision.
• Open arrangement is the result of gathering powers acting against each other.
• Nobody gathering will rule for each gathering there will be an equivalent andopposite.
• The bigger the gathering the more impact it will have.
• Arrangements are the result of dealing and bargain, will tend to bemoderate , reasonable for all and helpful for social solidness.
• The state is nonpartisan between these contending gatherings and acts like areferee between them