Mr. Preprah is the chairman of PALOO company and has become
concerned about the accumulation of cash in hand and in the deposit
accounts shown in the company's statement of financial position.
The company is in the manufacturing sector, supplying engines to
the auto markets in the Ghana and Africa. For the last 30 years the
company has grown predominantly by acquisition and has not invested
significantly in research and development on its own account. The
acquisitions have given the company the technology that it has
required and have all tended to be small, relative to the company's
total market capitalisation.
The company has a healthy current asset ratio of 1.3, although
its working capital cycle has an average of 24 unfunded days. The
company has not systematically embraced new manufacturing
technologies nor has it sought to reduce costs as a way of
rebuilding profitability. Managerial and structural problems within
divisions have led to a number of substantial projects overrunning
and losses being incurred as a result. It has also proven difficult
to ensure the accountability of managers promoting projects – many
of which have not subsequently earned the cash flows originally
promised. At the corporate level, much of the company's accounting
is on a contracts basis and over the years it has tended to be
cautious in its revenue recognition practices. This has meant that
earnings growth
has lagged behind cash flow.
Over the last year the company has come under strong
competitive pressure on the dominant defence side of its business
which, coupled with the slow-down in spending in this area across
the major African economies, has slowed the rate of growth of its
earnings. The company's gearing ratio is very low at 12% of total
market capitalisation and borrowing has invariably been obtained in
the European fixed interest market and used to support capital
investment in its Africa production facility. In the current year,
investment plans are at the lowest they have been in real terms
since the company was founded in the 1930s.
In discussion, the chairman comments upon the poor nature of
the company's buildings and its poor levels of pay which could, in
his view, be improved to reflect standards across the industry.
Directors' pay, he reminds you, is some 15% below industry
benchmarks and there is very little equity participation by the
board of directors. He also points out that the company's
environmental performance has not been good. Last year the company
was fined for an untreated discharge into a local river. There are,
he says, many useful things the company could do with the money to
help improve the long-term health of the business. However, he does
admit some pessimism that
business opportunities will ever again be the same as in
previous years and he would like a free and frank discussion at the
next board meeting about the options for the company. The company
has a very open culture where ideas are encouraged and freely
debated.
Mr. Preprah asks if you, as the newly appointed Finance
Director, would lead the discussion at the next board.
Required
(a) In preparation for a board paper entitled 'Agenda for
Change', write brief notes which identify the strategic financial
issues the company faces and the alternatives it might
pursue.
(b) Identify and discuss any ethical issues you believe are in
the above case and how the various alternatives you have identified
in (a) may lead to their resolution.