Question

Q1: What is the difference between a democracy and a developed democracy? give examples.

Q2: Why is the UK a developed democracy? Give evidence.

Q3: Why is the origin of democracy found in both Greece and Rome, even though Rome is not technically a democracy?

Q4: Why did the UK develop democratic institutions quicker than the rest of Europe?

Q5: Why can presidential systems lead to a greater likelihood of divided government? Give an example.

Q6: Why does the way a parliamentary system is set up distance the people from the executive and make it easier to pass legislation?

Q7: Why do post-modern values and post-industrial economies pose challenges to developed democracies? Give an example of each.

Q8: Why do SMD’s tend to create a two-part system in the governments that implement them?

Q9: Why do PR systems lead to more numerous and more disciplined parties

Answer 1

1. In direct democracy, people directly consider and decide on the legislator. In a representative democracy, people choose representatives to deliberate and decide on the legislature, in a parliamentary or presidential democracy. For example India. Today's (representative) modern democracies mimic the Roman model compared to the Greeks.

Developed democracies have a highly developed industrial and technological base and also have complex governmental systems. And in these developed democracies, the majority of the population will be somewhat prosperous, but with a relatively rich minority and a relatively poor substantial minority. for example

2. Over time, civil war, revolution and reforms have brought changes in the way the nation functions and the power of monarchy in the United Kingdom. The 20th century has seen changes with democracy and women's right to vote. Some 19th and early 20th century historians saw British history as an inevitable progression from tyranny and monarchy to constitutional monarchy and democracy. Britain has moved from a feudal monarchy to a free democracy.

3. Democracy played an important role in history, as the Greeks had an important (political) role, which led them to develop democracy. In addition, the Romans played an important role in adding a representative government. People lived during the reign of kings and other rulers who had power. The Roman Republic was a republic (go to understand). The citizens elected a representative to act on their behalf. Therefore, these representatives will have a specific mandate. In Greece, all were civil government. Greek democracy was more open and similar to Roman democracy. Greek democracy allowed all male citizens to vote and could vote on any law. ... only men with wealth and property could vote and the rich were chosen as representatives to make laws for all

Democracy in ancient Greece was one of the first forms of self-government in the ancient world. The system and ideas employed by the ancient Greeks had a profound effect on the development of democracy and its influence on the formation of the American government.

4. Because, firstly, in 1688 in England, there had already been a considerable deviation of the Church as a government structure. These deviations are still redefined as to how and to what extent it should be limited. Subsequently, further economic and political development in Europe, Europe is at the core of the modern state.

5. It is better to divide the face-to-face system into components by the government:

Direct election: In a presidential system, the president is often directly elected by the people. This makes the power of the President indirectly more legitimate than that of an appointed officer. However, this is not an essential feature of the presidential system. Some presidential states have indirectly elected heads of state.

Separation of powers: A presidential system establishes the President and the MLA as two parallel structures. This allows each feature to monitor and verify the other, avoiding power misuse.

Speed ​​and perseverance: A president with powerful powers can usually adopt change quickly. However, the separation of powers can also slow down the system.

Stability: A president may, on the basis of a definite mandate, offer more stability than a prime minister, who can be removed at any time.

6. The parliamentary system favors stronger political parties, more coalition and centralized interest groups, more centralized decision-making processes and more centralized and hierarchical administrative structures. In general, it is accepted that the existence of an independently elected leader with strong political privileges weakens the cohesion of the party. Parliamentarianism can lead to better governance, in particular: a) strong political parties, b) organization of corporate interest, c) close relations between chief agents within various branches of bureaucracy, d) centralized electoral responsibility (nationally ), E) a flexible decision-making ability, f) a more institutionalized political arena, eg) joint leadership

7. For democracy in the modernization phase, less emphasis is placed on formal democracy, such as voting, and more on d.