Question

In: Biology

This month, there was fanfare about the first case of using CRISPR invivo to treat Leber’s...

This month, there was fanfare about the first case of using CRISPR invivo to treat Leber’s congenital amaurosis 10 (LCA10) which is a leading cause of blindness in childhood. This is due to mutations in a large gene, CEP290.

The article comments that:

“For the latest trial, the components of the gene-editing system – encoded in the genome of a virus — are injected directly into the eye, near photoreceptor cells.”

A. Specifically, what components are the authors referring to when they say “the components of the gene-editing system – encoded in the genome of a virus”?

B. How is the zinc finger technology similar to the CRISPR approach?

C. What is a potential risk of using the CRISPR technology invivo?

D. If there was a suitable safe harbor, or the possibility to use a AAV virus to replace the mutant CEP290 gene in the photoreceptor cells (Similar to replacing the CNG3B channel using AAV5). What would be the potential difficulties compared to fixing the gene with CRISPR?

E. If the mutation in the CEP290 gene was known to be a premature stop codon, would the gene therapy be the safest approach to treat this disease?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution :

A) CRISPR/Cas 9 system is a recently developed technique that allows precise alteration to DNA through a process called as genome editing. This technique is a copy cat mechanism derived from the natural technic exibited by bacterial cells against foreign bacteriophage DNA( bacteriophages are viruses which infect bacteria).

To adapt CRISPR to function in virtually any eukaryotic cell type, minimal system consisting of a nuclease(here Cas 9) and an engineered guide RNA( gRNA or SgRNA ) have been devoloped. The gRNA contains a target specific guide sequence that directs the nuclease Cas9 to cleave target genomic DNA. This will introduce site-specific double-stranded breaks (DSBs). DSBs are overruled through either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR).

Presently there are no approved therapies for patients having Leber congenital amaurosis 10( LCA 10). LCA10 is a severe retinal dystrophy caused by mutations in the CEP290 gene. The most frequent mutation found in patients with LCA10 is a deep intronic mutation in CEP290 that generates a cryptic splice donor site. Recently researchers showed that guide RNA pairs coupled with Cas9 were used for removing the intronic splice mutation and restoring the expression of wild-type CEP290 gene. Alongside they have demonstrated that a dual adeno-associated virus  (AAV) system could effectively delete an intronic fragment of the Cep290 gene in the mouse retina.

B) Both Zinc-finger technology and CRISPR/Cas 9 technology are used to target specific DNA sequences. Both Cas 9 nuclease and zinc finger nuclease targets and induce double stranded breaks in DNA.


Related Solutions

Describe ways that CRISPR and microarray experiments could be used to study and/or treat coronavirus infections...
Describe ways that CRISPR and microarray experiments could be used to study and/or treat coronavirus infections like those causing the current pandemic
1) What is the principle of CRISPR technology and what is your opinion on the first...
1) What is the principle of CRISPR technology and what is your opinion on the first human gene editing case (conducted by Dr. He Jiankui) in China? (written in two separated paragraphs, more than 150~250 words in total)
In a 4-week study about the effectiveness of using magnetic insoles to treat plantar heel pain,...
In a 4-week study about the effectiveness of using magnetic insoles to treat plantar heel pain, 17 of 54 subjects who wore magnetic insoles felt all or mostly better, while 18 of 41 subjects who wore non- magnetic insoles felt all or mostly better. a) At 4% significance level, can we support a claim that there is a difference in the proportion of subjects who feel all or mostly better between the two groups? (Use the critical value approach and...
Citibank Performance Evaluation HBS Case Assignment First, read the Citibank case carefully. Then, think about the...
Citibank Performance Evaluation HBS Case Assignment First, read the Citibank case carefully. Then, think about the following questions (on your own, and in discussion with your team-members, if any). Note that Citibank uses the term “Performance Scorecard” in the same sense in which we use the term “Balanced Scorecard” in class. Why has Citibank introduced a Performance Scorecard? How would you have rated James’ performance before the Performance Scorecard was used? How do you rate James’ performance in each of...
List, explain and debate 5 pros and cons (5 for each) of using CRISPR technology to...
List, explain and debate 5 pros and cons (5 for each) of using CRISPR technology to edit human genetic material:
What is an example of using CRISPR-based technology to “knock out” genes to determine their function?
What is an example of using CRISPR-based technology to “knock out” genes to determine their function?
1. In CRISPR, why does it make sense to design our crRNA first before making any...
1. In CRISPR, why does it make sense to design our crRNA first before making any other changes to the genomic DNA? 2. In CRISPR, when searching for PAMs, GGNGG makes a much better PAM than NGG - why is this?
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending...
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending October 31, Marshall Inc. estimated the following operating results: Sales (40,000 × $90) $3,600,000 Manufacturing costs (40,000 units): Direct materials 1,440,000 Direct labor 480,000 Variable factory overhead 240,000 Fixed factory overhead 120,000 Fixed selling and administrative expenses 75,000 Variable selling and administrative expenses 200,000 The company is evaluating a proposal to manufacture 50,000 units instead of 40,000 units, thus creating an ending inventory of...
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending...
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending October 31, Marshall Inc. estimated the following operating results: Sales (12,800 x $45) $576,000 Manufacturing costs (12,800 units): Direct materials 350,720 Direct labor 83,200 Variable factory overhead 38,400 Fixed factory overhead 46,080 Fixed selling and administrative expenses 12,500 Variable selling and administrative expenses 15,200 The company is evaluating a proposal to manufacture 14,400 units instead of 12,800 units, thus creating an ending inventory of...
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending...
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending October 31, Marshall Inc. estimated the following operating results: Sales (27,200 x $96) $2,611,200 Manufacturing costs (27,200 units): Direct materials 1,572,160 Direct labor 372,640 Variable factory overhead 174,080 Fixed factory overhead 206,720 Fixed selling and administrative expenses 56,200 Variable selling and administrative expenses 68,000 The company is evaluating a proposal to manufacture 30,400 units instead of 27,200 units, thus creating an ending inventory of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT