Question

What was the impact of federal, state, and local governments on the American economy and civil rights in the 1950s.

Answer 1

The Civil Rights Act of 19641 was a true milestone, "the most important legislative act approved by Congress in the 20th century", according to recent history. 2 But did this law have economic, moral and legal significance? If there were significant economic benefits for African Americans during the era of civil rights, can we believe in federal law, as opposed to continued advances in education and racial attitudes? If the law is "an idea whose time has come" 3, as suggested by Senator Durksen, then perhaps he just ratified and started a process that is already underway.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was primarily inspired by the racial issue in the South. In the region, it has been a major success, creating lasting benefits for African Americans through significant reductions in exclusions and racial disparities, with few signs of significant inefficiencies in the process.

These achievements were not limited to the South, but black economic progress in other areas after regime change in national politics after 1980 proved more vulnerable to changes in judicial philosophy. What the Civil Rights Act has not created is a post-apartheid society.

Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race or color, but progress does not come primarily from race ignorance but from the systematic consideration of race.

The largest and longest lasting results have occurred in an area where racial awareness is strong. This difficult relationship between universalist and racial consciousness has historically been productive. But it is difficult to see this formula as the main carrier of the struggle against economic disparities in the present and the future.

I. Public acceptance

These results were not simply the result of the passage of legislation, but were necessary for the moral and political pressure from the civil rights movement as well as enforcement efforts from various bases of the federal government. .

Even large interest groups to understand that the civil rights revolution served their economic interests have been critical to the success of the law.

Second Spatial Discount in Labour Market: Regional Connection of Title VII

Racial bias and discrimination undoubtedly persist. But he was overwhelmed by structural changes in the American job market that could not happen in 1964. The principles of Title VII remain important and must be clearly maintained.

They have been elaborated in the Basic Law with judicial rulings with women and after sexual harassment. Subsequent legislation gave protection status to age, pregnancy and disability and we will soon see a new expansion of sexual orientation.

Third. Black Economic Earrings in Black VII

People in all these categories should be protected from discrimination in employment and occupation. But now most of the workforce is in a safe state.

Title VII is not expected to increase the living standards or living prospects of large numbers of low-income Americans in the future, as it did in the era of civil rights.

IV. Regionals after 1980

Southern companies clearly maintained racially and undoubtedly unequal work systems, but excluding blacks from all minimum jobs categories. The legal issues were so diverse that the body of legal principles that emerged from judicial decisions became the "Southern jurisprudence" of discrimination in Kama 76.

While this historical record provides no plans for the future, it still remains an inspiration, illustrating the power of a solid government policy with basic support and demonstrating the country's positive economic value. 'Overall.