Question

1) Should Texas adopt a full-time legislative model instead of a part-time model? Why or why not? Be sure to use information from the readings notes to support your answer.

2)Should Texas remove the governor's line-item veto power and only give him the option of a full veto? Why or why not? Be sure to use information from the readings to support your answer.

3)Does Texas provide too much authority and power to local government? Should some things be more regulated by the state than the local governments? Why or why not? Be sure to use information from the readings to support your answer.

Answer 1

Texas must have legislation based model as against part time model to ensure integration and concordance amongst all States with equal footing and eliminate ambiguity and uncertainty of various cases which are stuck by giving better control dyanmic and power structure.

No governor should be given full veto power as this causes misuse and generates conflicting views and also it doesn't take unanimous views making it public outcry issues and associated legal challenges prop up simultaneously.

Texas provides too much leeway to local government and thus needs effective regulation to avoid autocratic form of rule and lower down magnitude of strictness and thus ensure higher compliance as as against corrupt practices. Higher regulations also bring uniformity and higher vigilance and thus better governance standards can be observed.

PLEASE UPVOTE INCASE YOU LIKED THE ANSWER WILL BE ENCOURAGING FOR US THANKYOU VERY MUCH ALL THE BEST IN FUTURE.